Talk:Haskell features

hamming number

I think the original program for the hamming numbers involving # and the @ syntax might have been better. This version is more basic but that version demonstrated most aspects of Haskell as opposed to simply functional programming. jbolden1517Talk 02:21, 27 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Haskell features redirect

I'm not sure what to do, but given that the current haskell standard is Haskell2010, its inappropriate for "haskell features" to redirect to an article titled "haskell 98 features". Should this article be indeed "Haskell Features", so possibly it needs some tag that it's out of date, to add a section on features added in 2010 version. Or should those be separate articles - but that would have too much overlap, surely? I'll provisionally do the former, but ofc if someone has a better idea etc.. (user aryah, sry won't bother logging in)31.147.62.62 (talk) 10:31, 17 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Uhh, um, actually I'm not sure how to retitle it (w/o copy/pasting the thing to where the redirect is, but that sounds messy, so perhaps its wrong). So I'd just ask anyone checking this talk page to consider this proposal, of making this be the article about 'current' haskell features, rather than just about the previous standard, given how extensive the article is... 31.147.62.62 (talk) 10:36, 17 May 2011 (UTC)Reply

Primes one-liners attribution

order of sections

As a total noob to functional programming and Haskell, I would like to say it would be useful to have the section that defines types above the section that uses those types in examples. (i.e.: tom, Maybe, Left/Right all have to be implicitly understood, then you read the section explaining them at the bottom.)

thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.131.56.20 (talk) 23:08, 4 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.