This article was nominated for merging with January 2025 Southern California wildfires on January 9, 2025. The result of the discussion was to not merge.

This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects.

California: Los Angeles / Southern California Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This redirect is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance). This redirect is supported by Southern California task force (assessed as Low-importance). Disaster management Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Disaster managementWikipedia:WikiProject Disaster managementTemplate:WikiProject Disaster managementDisaster management Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. United States Low‑importance This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Wildfire Low‑importance Hurst Fire is part of WikiProject Wildfire, which collaborates on wildfire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the redirect attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.WildfireWikipedia:WikiProject WildfireTemplate:WikiProject WildfireWildfire Low This redirect has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

The content of the Hurst FireHurst Fire page was merged into January 2025 Southern California wildfires on 15 March 2025, and it now redirects there. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article, please see its history.

If any contributors know…please publish. Why did they name it the 'Hurst Fire' ? I understand Sylmar because that's an actual location on the map; It was initially called the 'Sylmar Fire' then was changed.

Is it named from a street, a neighborhood, the firefighter who first responded, ??? I cannot find any information as to how the name came to be. GTO3DEUCES (talk) 14:03, 8 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

I couldn't find any sources talking about the etymology of the fire, nor could I find anything named "Hurst" anywhere near Sylmar, so this is just my best guess: I believe they renamed it to distinguish it from the 2008 Sayre Fire (which is often referred to as the Sylmar Fire), and at that point the fire was already big enough that a geographic-based name wasn't necessary. Maybe Hurst is someone's name, but I would hate for a destructive wildfire to be named after me. We will probably never know who or what it's named for unless a reporter asks. Sewageboy (talk) 08:50, 11 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

771 acres at 70% containment, not likely to grow. Zero structures damaged or destroyed. Clearly does not meet WP:WILDFIRE guidelines of notablity.

I will hold off on proposing deletion as the upcoming wind event next week could change all of that. I sure as hell hope the winds don't make it meet notability criteria, though. Delectopierre (talk) 10:40, 11 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

There was a recent merge proposal that addressed this. Might be worth re-visiting after the current series of fires has ended. Xenryjake (talk) 11:43, 12 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Sounds good. Thanks for letting me know. Delectopierre (talk) 02:43, 14 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Currently, the only reliable source of the fire being contained is by the official Angeles National Forest account on X (or Twitter). Cal Fire however says it is 98% contained. ロドリゲス恭子 (talk) 23:57, 16 January 2025 (UTC)Reply