This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Law This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw ??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale. Taxation (inactive) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taxation, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.TaxationWikipedia:WikiProject TaxationTemplate:WikiProject TaxationTaxation United States Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Dear fellow editors: Should this article be merged with Gross income? Just a thought. Yours, Famspear 21:00, 24 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Actually, I think Gross income is currently too U.S.-centric. It's a universal book-keeping concept not limited to this (or any) tax code. Perhaps we should think of better ways to present the vast material in the IRC. bd2412 T 21:04, 24 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

A fellow editor inserted the following verbiage:

The legal meaning of the term "source" is also explicitly addressed in the Internal Revenue Code section 861 of the US Regulations found in Subchapter N part 1, aptly named "Determination of Sources of Income."

I moved the material here, for the following reason. Section 861 does not really address the meaning of the term "source" as used in section 61. What section 861 does is state which items of income are treated as "income from sources within the United States." The primary import of this treatment has to do with the application of Subchapter N of Chapter 1 of the Code.

It's one thing to say that Subchapter N deals with determination of sources of income; it's another thing to say that Subchapter N addresses the legal meaning of the term "source" itself.

The term "source" as used in section 61 (and in section 861, for that matter) is not really specifically defined in section 861, or in section 61, or in any other place in the Internal Revenue Code.

Further, it's not entirely clear whether the meaning of the term "source" as used in one Code section is necessarily going to be the same as the meaning in another Code section. The Internal Revenue Code is notorious for this kind of complexity, unfortunately.

Section 61, dealing with gross income, is about as all-encompassing as you can get. The Code provisions that pare down the definition of "gross income" (and that is really more important than the meaning of the term "source") are found in sections 101 through about 138 or so, if I recall correctly. Yours, Famspear 21:03, 25 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I organized the article by section and subsection according to type of income. Then I merged content from the article Income tax and compensation for services. Much of it needs to be better worked in and given context as well expanding the other types of income.EECavazos 02:42, 16 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Thanks to editor EECavazos for this work! Yours, Famspear 04:02, 16 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Looks good, Thanks Morphh ^(talk) 12:56, 16 October 2007 (UTC)Reply