Talk:Interstate 444

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Interstate 444. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:33, 12 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Interstate 444. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 18:20, 13 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

GA review

Latest comment: 1 year ago7 comments2 people in discussion
Passed. Locust member (talk) 21:37, 9 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Interstate 444/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: TheDoctorWho (talk · contribs) 06:10, 15 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Reviewer: Locust member (talk · contribs) 16:36, 8 April 2025 (UTC)Reply


Seems like a short and sweet article :) Will leave comments later today Locust member (talk) 16:36, 8 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

  • including Okmulgee, Oklahoma City, and Sand Springs, Oklahoma, and Joplin, Missouri. - "including Okmulgee, Oklahoma City, and Sand Springs, Oklahoma, as well as Joplin, Missouri." to remove repetition of "and"
  • The total length of I-444 is 2.51 miles (4.04 km) long - the source states 2.86 miles

These are the only two comments I have! The rest of the article looks broad and references look good when compared to other articles under a similar topic. It is stable and has been relatively unchanged since nomination. There are no copyvio issues and it seems written from NPOV. Tag me once those two comments are addressed Locust member (talk) 23:44, 8 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Locust member: I've fixed them both! I also updated all other instances to 2.86 as well, I was able to confirm that a previous version of that source stated 2.51 which is where that number came from. If you don't mind, before you close this could you spot check a few of the sources so I can claim CUP points for this (or at least confirm that you already have, if you did that in the original review? Thanks, TheDoctorWho (talk) 03:33, 9 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
ahhh yeah. I thought it was implied that the only sourcing issue I had was the one I mentioned but here's me outright stating it:
  • [2] and [3] confirm the route description as seen in their sources (standard for articles under this topic)
  • [5] confirms Plans to enclose portions of Tulsa with Interstate Highways existed as early as 1957. Labeled as "Tulsa's Comprehensive Plan", the IDL would develop a beltway around Downtown Tulsa.
  • [6] confirms Construction on these freeways continued into the late 1970s. The final portion opened on November 5, 1981.
  • [7] confirms Both I-244 and I-444 initially used exit numbers and milemarkers that continued counting from where they split at I-44. This resulted in I-444 utilizing numbers in the 90s [...] I-444 was later resigned to avoid confusion caused from the previous numbering scheme. In 1995, further confusion between I-244 and I-444 prompted the Oklahoma Department of Transportation (ODOT) to convert I-444 into an unsigned route in favor of signing its concurrencies instead. At this point, the exit numbers were removed from signs leaving only the lettered suffixes. These letters were also eventually removed from signs
  • [8] confirms In 2021, the Oklahoma House of Representatives tentatively approved a study to explore future alternatives to the Inner Dispersal Loop due to its appearance and expensive cost to maintain.
I will  Pass this now. Nice work! Locust member (talk) 21:36, 9 April 2025 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.