Talk:KMFDM

Good articleKMFDM has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 20, 2007Good article nomineeNot listed
April 7, 2010Good article nomineeListed
February 12, 2011Featured article candidateNot promoted
April 8, 2011Peer reviewReviewed
June 28, 2012Peer reviewReviewed
August 19, 2012Featured article candidateNot promoted
November 1, 2012Featured article candidateNot promoted
Current status: Good article

Should MDFMK be a part of KMFDM? It's mixed right now

What I mean is, should MDFMK be incorporated into KMFDM's history? Because as of right now, it's all mixed up.

If we DID incorporate it:

  • All member years would incorporate the MDFMK era. So for Sascha, it'd say 1984–present. This is how it looks now.
  • The infobox would have unbroken years. So, it'd say 1984–present. This is NOT how it looks now.
  • The self-titled MDFMK album would be listed under Discography. This is NOT how it looks now.
  • The timeline (on the separate members page) would have a black line for the MDFMK album, along with a colored bar for the MDFMK era. This is how it looks now.
  • The brief MDFMK tours would be listed under the List of tours section. This is NOT how it looks now.

If we did NOT incorporate it:

  • All member years would ignore the MDFMK era. So for Sascha, it'd say 1984–1999, 2002–present. This is NOT how it looks now.
  • The infobox would have divided years. So, it'd say 1984–1999, 2002–present. This is how it looks now.
  • The self-titled MDFMK album would not be listed under Discography whatsoever. This is how it looks now.
  • The timeline (on the separate members page) would have no line for the MDFMK album nor any bars for the MDFMK era. This is NOT how it looks now.
  • The brief MDFMK tours would not be listed under the List of tours section. This is how it looks now.

So, who is in favor of which? I feel like it needs to be one way or the other, no in between. Xanarki (talk) 00:36, 30 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

Personally, I think MDFMK should not be incorporated into KMFDM. It should be treated as a separate project, like Excessive Force, KGC, etc. And I feel like, for a long time, that's how it was viewed here. But I'm willing to see other POVs otherwise. Xanarki (talk) 00:39, 30 September 2025 (UTC)Reply

should the page mention columbiners?

i obviously dont want to talk about the god awful columbiners, but many people think that kmfdm supports columbiners/shooters. should there be a section discussing the widely believed connection between columbiners and kmfdm fans/members?? Oingoboingofan (talk) 21:11, 11 November 2025 (UTC)Reply

Their statement they made after the shooting feels like statement enough on their stance, however I see your point. Maybe like find more on what their reaction was? [1] (Maybe this site could be helpful? It has quotes from the band) HarbingerOfEntropy (talk) 14:55, 20 January 2026 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.