Talk:LBRY
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the LBRY article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 6 months |
| This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The following are reference ideas for LBRY. Click [show] for details. The following reference(s) may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
Odysee independent article
in my opinion, Odysee deserves its own independent article. it is one of the main competitors to youtube especially after the removal of the dislike counter from youtube.ArmorredKnight (talk) 16:54, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- I agree! Ilovehugging (talk) 02:07, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Whether Odysee is notable for its own article is determined by the existence of reliable sources, not us. Dexxor (talk) 08:46, 6 February 2022 (UTC)
- Now that Odysee is it's own company, it should have one! Ilovehugging (talk) 16:36, 30 March 2022 (UTC)
- I've written a draft but it was deleted because Wikipedia:Criteria_for_speedy_deletion#G11 Wiktorpyk (talk) 22:29, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
i agree also. it deserves an one article. its a very huge website and more famous then lbry! also its important against the youtube monopol. we can not allowed to have you tube here and one of the top 10 opponents in the world not. many say its eaven the nr 2 in the western world. OF COURSE it needs an own article. 2A02:1210:1671:2E00:94A3:F66F:7F75:C276 (talk) 22:45, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
- I agree I am surprised it doesn't. it is clearly is two companies now — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2603:8000:5000:E9D2:4CAB:F4F1:D616:303F (talk) 07:57, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.