Talk:Linear code sequence and jump

Layout Update

The layout of the article has been updated, a history section added, some additional references included and some minor edits for accuracy. --Nat Hillary 00:04, 5 January 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nat hillary (talk • contribs)

Added reference to contemporary JJ-path moniker. Nat Hillary 18:35, 11 November 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nat hillary (talk • contribs)

Typo correction. Nat Hillary 17:23, 11 November 2009 (UTC)

Created by. Nat Hillary 15:51, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Jorgensen (2013) and DD-path

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I think he is actually wrong. His definition of DD-path is a bit hard to grasp, but looking at his examples, DD-paths never overlap, even for conditional jumps. So DD-path can't be the same thing as JJ-path/LCSAJ. 188.27.81.64 (talk) 08:13, 18 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Yes, he is wrong. An LCSAJ can contain a number of decision points (on average, 4) but at each of them control flow passes straight on. A DD-path contains no decision points. There is no connection between LCSAJs and DD-paths. [David Hedley - co-author of original LCSAJ paper.] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.26.54.178 (talk) 09:15, 11 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.