Talk:Linux/GA1

GA Review

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Artem.G (talk · contribs) 12:58, 21 October 2021 (UTC)Reply


I was going to review the article, but, unfortunately, it's a quick fail.

Reasons - nearly 1/3 of the text is unsourced, there are multiple tags: [citation needed], [better source needed], [needs update] (with an info from 2008), (self-published data). Besided, the aricle is outdated - for example: "As of May 2011, about 8% to 13% of a modern Linux distribution is made of GNU components", "In September 2008, Microsoft's then-CEO Steve Ballmer stated that 60% of web servers ran Linux", "IDC's Q1 2007 report indicated that Linux held 12.7% of the overall server market at that time", "packaged software running Linux was expected to[needs update] exceed $35.7 billion by 2008". Furthermore, the nominator of the article made no contribution to it; I can't recall whether there is any rule about such nominations, but I don't think that all the problems could (and should) be addressed during this review. If the article would be updated and properly sourced, it can be nominated again. Artem.G (talk) 12:58, 21 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Even stranger is the fact that nominating this article for GA was the editor's first edit... - Ahunt (talk) 13:04, 21 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.