Talk:Messier 4

Untitled

I took away the expansion tag but couldn't find it in the list of requests for expansion. I think this article is decent enough now. --Kalsermar 20:16, 26 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the debate was Move all. —Wknight94 (talk) 21:14, 12 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Requested move

Discussion

Please discuss this move at Talk:Globular Cluster M2.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

SETI TARGET?

Has SETI directed any radio surveys at Messier 4?

67.190.27.217 (talk) 00:44, 30 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Distance

I just read Caputo, Castellani, & Quarta, and nowhere do they say the distance is 2,200 parsecs. It's an interesting paper, but it doesn't mention distance. It does offer up some distance modulus's (moduli?) which give values of 2,600 parsecs, but those moduli are ... hypothetical. Currently, the best article I can find is Neeley, J.R et al. 2015, ApJ, 808, 11, which give a modulus of 11.399. What do other people think?

NASA says it is 5,500 light-years away (1,686 parsecs). www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/2017/messier-4 --Gronk Oz (talk) 10:40, 14 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Millisecond pulsar

I removed the unreferenced info about a 3.0 millisecond pulsar. I'm pretty sure the object in question is PSR 1821-24 which is in M28, not M4 (see DOI 10.1038/328399a0). The website https://www.messier.seds.org/m/m004.html erroneously places that object in M4, which is probably how this error worked its way into Wikipedia.PopePompus (talk) 01:18, 2 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

In fiction

Although Arthur Clarke quite deliberately does not mention any specific globular cluster in his famous short story "Nightfall", for some reason, that story has come to be associated with this one. 2001:8003:E490:7D01:B14E:7243:B4B4:7D29 (talk) 08:05, 21 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

I don't see any reliable references to support this. Lithopsian (talk) 10:54, 21 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.