This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Software This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing This redirect is supported by WikiProject Software. Microsoft (inactive) This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Microsoft, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.MicrosoftWikipedia:WikiProject MicrosoftTemplate:WikiProject MicrosoftMicrosoft

The content of the Microsoft P-CodeMicrosoft P-Code page was merged into p-code machine#Microsoft P-Code on 2 January 2022. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article, please see its history.

Shouldn't this article be written in the past tense? Medinoc (talk) 11:47, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Probably not. The article on Windows 95 is written in present tense. You can still create P-Code binaries with the obsolete IDEs the article mentions and my understanding is that they still can be run, so it does, in a sense, remain current. --Blah2 (talk) 20:54, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also, WP:WAS is a thing. -- C. A. Russell (talk) 20:08, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The "VB P-code Information by Mr Silver" url is occupied by a doman sitter. And so, because of their farcial robots.txt policy, the Wayback machine refuses to show the archived page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.206.162.148 (talk) 08:52, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Microsoft P-Code. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/backgrnd/html/msdn_c7pcode2.htm
• Corrected formatting/usage for http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/en-us/vbcon98/html/vbconcompilingyourprojecttonativecode.asp
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151222171103/http://www.woodmann.com/crackz/Tutorials/Vbpcode.htm to http://www.woodmann.com/crackz/Tutorials/Vbpcode.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:22, 10 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This article is a stub, it will never not be a stub, and it's tagged for lack of references. It needs to be merged somewhere relevant. (I tagged Visual Basic, but I don't have strong opinions or the right background for it, so pick whatever makes sense.) -- C. A. Russell (talk) 20:10, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest that p-code machine might be a better target; agree that it is worth merging somewhere. Klbrain (talk) 12:55, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Y Merge completed Klbrain (talk) 00:04, 2 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]