This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: Technology This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met Associated task forces: /  Military science, technology, and theory task force

I think it's worth merging them. That latter books are based on Friedman's work, and were done with Friedman's help, if I'm not mistaken. Not to knock Friedman's immense knowledge, mind you, but I think there's enough similarity for one article. Mmernex 13:05, 13 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Friedman didn't help to any appreciable extent with the production of Callimahos' series, other than providing the original series from which Callimahos' was derived. To me it depends on whether it was intended that the Friedman-book article ever be expanded to say more than it currently does. As it stands, it could simply be redirected to the Callimahos-book article and the latter augmented with the Friedman book listings (ISBN etc.). The distinction between the two series needs to be kept clear, however. If, on the other hand, more was supposed to be said eventually about the Friedman book specifically, then I think it would be best maintained as a separate article. — DAGwyn 17:41, 14 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Military Cryptanalytics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100527155252/http://www.nsa.gov/public_info/declass/military_cryptanalysis.shtml to http://www.nsa.gov/public_info/declass/military_cryptanalysis.shtml
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www2.cddc.vt.edu/www.eff.org/Activism/FOIA/Gilmore_v_NSA/summary_judgement.memo

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:46, 31 January 2018 (UTC)Reply