Talk:Moggmentum

No consensus

Hi, User:AusLondonder! I understand the AfD was closed as 'no consensus', which does not mean redirect. Am I not in the right?Zigzig20s (talk) 01:28, 25 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

User:AusLondonder: Yes, I read your edit summary, and the AfD was not "Delete" or "Redirect", it was "No consensus". So please restore this article, and nominate it for a second AfD.Zigzig20s (talk) 03:10, 25 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for your reply and for starting this discussion. Did you read the closing summary of the AfD? The closer stated "In any case, discussion has died down, and merging the content does not require AfD." It is already covered in overzealous detail at Jacob Rees-Mogg#Rumoured run for leadership. Does that not suffice? AusLondonder (talk) 03:11, 25 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
User:AusLondonder: The closer was yourself! Sorry, this looks like you are trying to delete the article. Please restore it and start a second AfD. That is how it works. You need to reach consensus to delete content. Or, restore it and propose a merge and wait for consensus.Zigzig20s (talk) 03:13, 25 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
No, the closer was not me please see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Moggmentum. AusLondonder (talk) 03:17, 25 September 2017 (UTC)Reply
Fair enough (it's a little late here). But the closer says, "No consensus to keep the article or merge the content to another.". There is no consensus to merge, and I object to the merge without further discussion. Please restore the content and start another AfD or start a merge proposal.Zigzig20s (talk) 03:20, 25 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Possibly useful source

Today's Observer has an article Jacob Rees-Mogg: on the trail of the pinstripe pretender which may be a useful source for this article.— Rod talk 10:54, 8 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

What is totally missing from this article, is what it means to be part of moggmentum

Based on the this man's voting record, it goes without saying, the people behind Moggmentum are aligned with his values. His values are not the record of a person with an open mind and beautiful soul.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.159.166.248 (talk) 14:21, 10 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

Voting record collapsed due to its size by Seagull123 Φ 22:47, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

Johnson government, Covid, Election loss, Aftermath

Mogg lost his seat at the 2024 election.

However it's unclear if he, or these groups of activists, hope a return to politics could occur one day.

Additionally, there's no coverage of his ministerial positions in the early 2020s. How did Moggmentum advocates react to his time in the news?

Food for thought. ElectronicsForDogs (talk) 13:14, 22 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.