Talk:Monotonality
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Monotonality be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other websites. |
Goals
I drafted up this article a couple weeks ago, but it needs much work. For myself and future editors I offer this list of
- Goals
- Expand to include views on the unity of tonal structure both before and after Schoenberg (especially Schenker--although not extensively, as there is already a Schenkerian analysis article), so this is not so Schoenberg-centric.
- Expand and re-organize to explain analytical methods of Schoenberg and others of similar methods.
As I created this article I will refrain from assigning it a class. —Mahlerlover1 (converse) 02:52, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
- I think we need more sources. The article mentions Schenker but there is no reference to Schenker's writing. I imagine Schenker could have mentioned it in his Free Composition or something, but it should be properly cited. Also, monotonality is quite an important topic in Schoenberg's theory and Schenker's theory, so someone should expand the article. — 星球统领 (talk) 14:52, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.