Talk:Particle physics
 | This  level-3 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | This article has been mentioned by a media organization:
|
Wiki Education assignment: 4A Wikipedia Assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 21 August 2023 and 16 December 2023. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: Meme2611, Beastkiller6142.
— Assignment last updated by Timbenuka (talk) 03:08, 16 November 2023 (UTC)
Future section?
@Drbogdan Are plans and speculation notable aspects of particle physics? News about plans? Do we want to have research proposals from groups doing particle physics? Grant proposals? Etc. I say no, only verifiable information about particle physics here.
It seems reasonable to mention the P5 group but the details of the P5 group belong on Particle Physics Project Prioritization Panel. Johnjbarton (talk) 16:40, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- @Johnjbarton: (and others) - Thank You for your comments - yes - *entirely* agree - no problem whatsoever - whatever is finally decided is completely ok with me - Thanks again for your comments - and - Stay Safe and Healthy !! - Drbogdan (talk) 17:01, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! I moved your paragraph into the P5 page where it nicely filled in a blank spot in the TOC! Johnjbarton (talk) 17:26, 8 December 2023 (UTC)
Subatomic particles section
The first part of this section not only uses a different style of writing, but contains several factual inaccuracies - in particular in combination with the table. Consider removing the first two paragraphs, the table, or updating both the text and table to reflect information from other articles. 194.166.214.235 (talk) 11:47, 29 August 2024 (UTC)
common name for nuclear and particle physics?
what's the common name for the scientific field that comprises nuclear and particle physics? and for the field including the formation of molecules (but not the interaction of molecules which would be chemistry, right? but chemistry could be seen as a subfield of physics because it deals with the structures and processes formed by the 'weak force'...)? "physics of the smallest" (vs physics of the biggest = cosmology) would be wrong, because the topic includes energy, and the reach of which is definitely not small... "physics of matter and energy" would include chemistry (and as a subdiscipline biology...). thanx. HilmarHansWerner (talk) 13:45, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
- This topic is covered in Physics and in Chemistry. Johnjbarton (talk) 16:14, 18 January 2025 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.