Talk:Pierre Waldeck-Rousseau
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
This article could really use an introductory summary of Waldeck-Rousseau's major achievements and such.
First name
Is the French Wikipedia really to be considered a reliable source on the man's first name? I have a number of books which refer to him as "René Waldeck-Rousseau." I have Jean-Denis Bredin's The Affair: The Case of Alfred Dreyfus and Robert Tombs' France 1814-1914 - both use René. So do Britannica and Columbia Encyclopedia. A quick Google Books search gives about the same number of results for Pierre and René, but those for René include Leslie Derfler's The Dreyfus Affair and a number of historical works in French. Now, there are certainly also sources that refer to him as "Pierre." The thing of it is, it's very easy to see why someone might mistakenly think he was known as Pierre - it's the first of his given names. It's much harder to see why someone might mistakenly think he was known as René. I'd say the balance of evidence favors "René," whatever the French wikipedia may say. john k (talk) 16:23, 1 March 2009 (UTC)
- In his family, he was known as René, but as a barrister and later as a politician he was called Pierre, probably because when he began to practise, his father, also known as René, was member of the same bar and mayor of Nantes (source: his biography by Pierre Sorlin, Paris, Armand Colin, 1966). The signatory of all his writings as a senator and a minister (papers, books, bills, decrees, etc.) was « Waldeck-Rousseau » without any first name. See the websites of French Senate, National Assembly and Prime minister. Therefore we can keep « Pierre », I think. Utorak-sedamdeset (talk) 10:22, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
- Damned French government. It seems like either name would be appropriate, so I guess may as well leave it as it is. john k (talk) 03:40, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
It should be René surely.i've read many books about the period in English and in French and all without exception call him René. If you read contemporary sources in English and French it is also René. he may well have chosen to use Pierre when he was being a lawyer but that is not what he is remembered as. Perhaps something in the text to this effect would stop the confusion. dorkinglad (talk)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.
