This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Fashion Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Marketing & Advertising Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Marketing & Advertising, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Marketing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Marketing & AdvertisingWikipedia:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingTemplate:WikiProject Marketing & AdvertisingMarketing & Advertising Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. Occupations (defunct) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Occupations, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.OccupationsWikipedia:WikiProject OccupationsTemplate:WikiProject OccupationsOccupations Women's History Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is substantially duplicated in one or more external publications. Since these publication(s) copied Wikipedia, rather than the reverse, please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source: Diana Baus (January 3, 2016), PLUS-SIZE MODELS: PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE, Medium

Archives

Archive 1

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 3 February 2020 and 23 May 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Erinb333.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 06:47, 17 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Plus-size model. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.curve-film.com/tami_info.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:06, 1 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Plus-size model. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121107002117/http://plusmodelradio.com/episode-115/ to http://plusmodelradio.com/episode-115/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110605215319/http://www.nbc.com/the-tonight-show/episode-guide/keywords/ashley%20graham to http://www.nbc.com/the-tonight-show/episode-guide/keywords/ashley%20graham
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100505174536/http://www.spreadit.org/ashley-graham-model-plus-size/ to http://www.spreadit.org/ashley-graham-model-plus-size/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140808054123/http://www.chardline.com/2013/05/29/tess-munster-retro-chic/ to http://www.chardline.com/2013/05/29/tess-munster-retro-chic/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:59, 31 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

The introduction provides several synonyms in quotes, but there is no definition in the introduction or elsewhere in the article what all these synonyms mean exactly. (Whether the model has to be taller than average, or heavier than normal, or overweighted, or something else, to qualify as "plus-size".) --Alexey Muranov (talk) 07:34, 27 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

This article claims that a plus-size model is "an individual from size 12 and above who is engaged primarily in modeling plus-size clothing." However, size 12 varies from manufacturer to manufacturer and from country to country, so it is a vague definition. Is there any widely agreed upon definition of what constitutes a plus-size model. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SnappyDragonPennyroyal (talk • contribs) 06:26, 12 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

The word that comes most immediately to almost everyone's mind is fat. This word should be used in the article. "Plus size" does not make sense. *What*, plus size? Plus designates the arithmetic operation of addition and is used to separate the two operands (the quantities being added together). Furthermore, were a neologism based on the word "plus" to be introduced the grammatically correct usage would be "plus sized", not "plus size". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.142.227.60 (talk) 03:19, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

But does size 12 refers to the U.S. standard clothing size scale or what? --ZandDev 16:41, 20 September 2024 (UTC)Reply