This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Mathematics Mid‑priority This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics Mid This article has been rated as Mid-priority on the project's priority scale.

The article has been sitting in a half-finished state for a while. I expanded it and set it up for further improvement.

• This article needs to be at an undergraduate level at the highest
• More references, especially at the undergrad level, are needed
• The notation should be kept as simple as possible (but not more simple than that).
• I think that a proof would be nice, and the proof is elementary anyway.
• More corollaries would be good.

CMummert 13:42, 25 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

I believe the 'alternative' definition I added using quantifier blocks and bounded quantifiers should probably be the primary definition. However, I don't remember and need to get back to working on my thesis.Logicnazi (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

The definition of ${\displaystyle \Sigma _{m}^{0}}$ differs from the traditional one for ${\displaystyle m=0}$ since it would not allow bounded quantifiers. Since Post theorem doesn't say anything about ${\displaystyle \Sigma _{0}^{0}}$ relation this doesn't affect the theorem, but it seems misleading. Catrincm (talk) 13:34, 30 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

What does it mean: "at most if and only if"? Is it equivalence or one-direction consequence?

Eugepros (talk) 10:08, 6 October 2018 (UTC)Reply

I think they mean to say that ${\displaystyle \varphi (n,n_{1})}$ is true if and only if ${\displaystyle T}$ halts at or prior to time ${\displaystyle n_{1}}$. Related to that, the assertion that ${\displaystyle \varphi }$ can be a ${\displaystyle \Delta _{0}}$ formula (only having bounded quantifiers) is almost certainly incorrect, or else it needs a citation. I've never seen any formalization of turing machines where the halting time function is ${\displaystyle \Delta _{0}}$. Obviously ${\displaystyle \varphi }$ is ${\displaystyle \Delta _{1}}$, which is sufficient for Post's theorem, and it's even primitive recursive, but the idea that it could be ${\displaystyle \Delta _{0}}$ seems implausible. Jade Vanadium (talk) 20:13, 8 July 2024 (UTC)Reply