Talk:Process theory
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Historical fallacy
I would like an example of a fallacy described in the text. Are there any suitable to the article? 79.220.181.164 (talk) 17:07, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
Comment
This entry would benefit from a reference to people, apart from Whitehead, who are working on "process theoretical" accounts of, say, psychology. What happened after Dewey's "Reflex Arc" paper?
Variance theory
I tried to find references on the Internet for the so-called Variance theory (mentioned in the article) and the only remotely similar results I got were the following papers on Models in Information Systems: Process-variance models in information security awareness research & Process, Variance, and Systems. The second paper connects at some point this theory with Management Research citing other specialized papers on the matter. Could someone having better knowledge of the corresponding literature add some proper citations to the articles and elaborate on the interdisciplinary connections implied by the article? --Omnipaedista (talk) 02:39, 12 May 2009 (UTC)
Surgence
Closest definition I could find was for 'surgent'. Although the word is intuitively understood, is it a real word? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.174.67.203 (talk) 02:12, 3 March 2012 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.