This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Profanity article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article.

Add new text under old text. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Start a new topic Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed Article policies Neutral point of view No original research Verifiability

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 3 months

This  level-4 vital article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Sociology Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale. Linguistics Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Linguistics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of linguistics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LinguisticsWikipedia:WikiProject LinguisticsTemplate:WikiProject LinguisticsLinguistics Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wikipedia is not censored. Images or details contained within this article may be graphic or otherwise objectionable to some readers, to ensure a quality article and complete coverage of its subject matter. For more information, please refer to Wikipedia's content disclaimer regarding potentially objectionable content and options for not seeing an image.

Archives

Archive 1 Archive 2

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 90 days are automatically archived 1 or more at a time by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 5.

“Profanity is often associated with lower class professions like soldiers and carters.”

- Not very important, but someone should provide a short explanation of class or a link to caste. It isn’t guaranteed that the person reading this understands what ‘lower class’ means. 2600:4040:54C7:3600:E1A7:FD10:B5F2:4C95 (talk) 22:15, 10 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

As Adult languageAdult language and other such redirect here, that could refer to sexual language, so please add a link in the hatnote to sexual content;

Please change :

{{redirect-several|dab=no|Abusive language (law)|Profane (religion)|Profanity (instant messaging client)|Strong Language (film){{!}}''Strong Language'' (film)|Curse (disambiguation)|Swear (disambiguation)}}

to

{{redirect-several|dab=no|Abusive language (law)|Profane (religion)|Profanity (instant messaging client)|Strong Language (film){{!}}''Strong Language'' (film)|Curse (disambiguation)|Swear (disambiguation)|sexual content}}

-- 65.93.183.249 (talk) 20:16, 2 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

 Done meamemg (talk) 14:34, 3 June 2025 (UTC)Reply

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

In the "Anatomy and sexuality" section, a claim is made that "Danish uses testicles as a term of abuse with klotzaak." I don't have access to the Ljung paper, but I suspect that this is a double error on the part of either Ljung or whoever wrote this passage of the article. As far as I can tell, no such word exists in Danish; however, it is true that *klootzak* (not *klotzaak*) means "ballsack" and is a term of abuse in Dutch. Cstuartroe (talk) 22:44, 18 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Please change

Danish uses testicles as a term of abuse with {{lang|da|klotzaak}}.

to

Dutch uses testicles as a term of abuse with {{lang|nl|klootzak}}.

The following citation may need replacement as well, if the error is present in the Ljung paper.

 Done @Cstuartroe I checked the paper and it does indeed say Dutch. I made the edit on the page. InfernoHues (talk) 23:09, 18 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

@InfernoHues You only partially addressed my request. The word is *klootzak*, not *klotzaak*.

 Done Day Creature (talk) 00:48, 19 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Day Creature @Cstuartroe The source book lists the word as "klotzaak", which is why I kept it as is. I don't speak Dutch though, so I can't personally verify anything. InfernoHues (talk) 21:30, 19 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

@Day Creature @InfernoHues Ok, well "klotzaak" is definitely an error. I'm not sure what the procedure is for providing sources, but do these suffice?

• https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/klootzak
• https://www.mijnwoordenboek.nl/vertaal/NL/EN/klootzak
• https://translate.google.com/?sl=en&tl=nl&text=What%20an%20asshole!&op=translate
• https://context.reverso.net/translation/dutch-english/klootzak Cstuartroe (talk) 04:45, 20 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Looks good to me - marking the request as answered. Day Creature (talk) 05:43, 20 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

Thank you! Cstuartroe (talk) 20:48, 20 December 2025 (UTC)Reply

The redirect Unfounded profanity has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 May 30 § Unfounded profanity until a consensus is reached. Jruderman (talk) 02:31, 30 May 2026 (UTC)Reply

The redirect Abusive language has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 June 25 § Abusive language until a consensus is reached. Dingolover6969 (talk) 10:31, 25 June 2026 (UTC)Reply