This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. WikiProject Companies To-do: Here are some tasks awaiting attention: Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes Maintain : Portal:Companies Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs Other : Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner Answer requests for comments Computing Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by Computer hardware task force (assessed as Low-importance). Taiwan Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Quanta computers are fast and take time get a virus

As an employee of QCG (Quanta Computer Germany) I know that the figure of 30000 is much too small. QSMC (Quanta Shanghai) alone has more than 45000 employees. Alas, I do not know any numbers about QCI (Quanta Taiwan, huge) or QCA (Quanta USA, two sites, don't know size). QCG's 200-500 employees (many temporary workers, depending on projects) are negligible for world-wide figures.

The official name should be "Quanta Computer" not "Quanta Computers".--72.52.66.11 15:27, 9 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Didn't Quanta have the 'iphone' as an off the shelf design before apple bought it? I would have thought this would be of interest to most people who were under the impression it was an apple design. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.0.214.59 (talk) 14:03, 2 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Teehee, wouldn't surprise me, the thing about Apple, irony is the one's who complain about 'cheap chinese s**t' are the one's holding Iphone's made by Foxconn in Shenzhen —Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.91.167.135 (talk) 09:27, 22 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Why is this article a stub, they had 24 billion dollar revenue and are listed as the second largest technology company in the world by market capitalization. I would do so myself but i lack the expertise to find suitable sources in this area and I havent edited wikipedia myself before. This is clearly a notable company worthy of at least more detailed financial information. 114.76.63.231 (talk) 12:46, 4 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Anybody notice how this article REALLY plays up the image of Quanta, saying that " With leading technology and strong R&D, Quanta has become a leader in hi-tech markets"... and so on. Perhaps somebody from within Quanta edited this article, because all of those claims are not cited...

--66.227.233.171 (talk) 06:20, 27 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

I made some edits here that hopefully dialed down some un-cited claims. There was a long list of supposed contracts they had with notable companies with a citation for none of them. If they get added back, I think they need to be cited. All of them. I don’t doubt the claim as much as I feel like it being un-cited contributes to misunderstanding. Similarly, I renamed “Products” to “Manufactured products” because— they are not their products. This is a manufacturer, but the products are not theirs. Louie Mantia (talk) 10:55, 28 May 2025 (UTC)Reply