The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When editing this article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve it, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, use the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.

	Red Army was one of the History good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones Date Process Result December 13, 2006 WikiProject peer review Reviewed May 22, 2007 Good article nominee Listed April 3, 2008 Good article reassessment Delisted Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on February 23, 2005, and February 23, 2006. Current status: Delisted good article

This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Military history: National / Asian / European / Russian & Soviet / World War II This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces: /  National militaries task force Asian military history task force European military history task force Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force World War II task force Soviet Union: Russia / History / Military Top‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union Top This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Russia (assessed as Top-importance). This article is supported by the history of Russia task force. This article is supported by the Russian, Soviet and CIS military history task force. Socialism Mid‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archives

1, 2, 3

This page has archives. Topics inactive for 90 days are automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III if there are more than 3.

Two sentences side by side give seriously differing "official" numbers:

• " Officially, the Red Army lost 6,329,600 killed in action (KIA), 555,400 deaths by disease"
• "The official grand total of losses amounted to 8,668,400.[3][4] This is the official total dead"

Come, mister tallyman, tally me banana. An clarification is due. --Altenmann >talk 02:43, 28 February 2025 (UTC)Reply

Added text: "The exact number of Japanese women and girls raped by Soviet soldiers and local Chinese mobs remains uncertain" Therefore you cannot attribute all these to Red Army. --Altenmann >talk 12:40, 14 April 2025 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I’d like to request a reassessment of the article Charles Thau, currently rated as C-class.

The article has undergone substantial expansion and improvement, including:

• Reliable, secondary sourcing from international and U.S. publications (e.g., *Freie Presse*, *Der Spiegel*, *The Forward*, *Military History Now*, *Milwaukee Journal*).
• A well-organized structure with clear sectioning (Early life, Partisan activity, Red Army service, Postwar, Recognition).
• Use of historical photographs with proper attribution.
• Compliance with WP:NPOV and WP:V, with personal connection declared.

I believe the article now satisfies the six B-class criteria: 1. **Well-written** 2. **Verifiable** 3. **Broad in coverage** 4. **Neutral** 5. **Stable** 6. **Illustrated**

Any feedback from reviewers is welcome. Thank you! Milwaukee911 (talk) 15:27, 24 July 2025 (UTC)Reply

The redirect 10th Cavalry Division (Soviet Union) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2026 June 2 § 10th Cavalry Division (Soviet Union) until a consensus is reached. Mdewman6 (talk) 07:30, 2 June 2026 (UTC)Reply