Talk:Red Issue

"The Red Issue website also plays host to the fans forum, a site where Top Reds convene to discuss how much better they are than Johnny-Come-Lately fans (JCLs), Out of Towners (OOTs) and to discuss how rubbish Sir Alex Ferguson really is and how they could do his job much better. These Top Reds like to think the site has obtained somewhat of a cunt-status, although football is rarely dicsussed and the majority of the topics descend into schoolboy discussions about Football Manager 2006, holidays in Prague, tunes for your iPod, young ladies' underwear and wanking." Not to mention the moronic tripe spouted by Davidian on topics ranging from shit music to crap music.


The biggest twat on the forum is a fat fuck known as 'Puressence'

Erm its now been updated and Julie is trying for that title! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.183.136.194 (talk) 22:06, 5 August 2008 (UTC)Reply


Err. I think that part needs a litte makeover, don't you? Is it NPOV? Zozza 14:45, 5 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Sounds about right to me. Jon.



Not to piss on Red Issue's Wikipedia Parade, but Red Issue is comprised of the lesser footy knowledgable compared to redcafe.net which has maintained a top ten position on the Official Premier League Fantasy Football Top Leagues list. (source http://fantasy.premierleague.com/M/stats.mc?stat=bestleagues ) Despite their elitest attitudes they fail to make it within the top 50 leagues. Typical exchange of how they repulse each other>>>(additional source link: http://www.si-sv1646.com/showthread.php?t=41943) 0oeat0meoo 05:31, 8 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.