Talk:Red Rectangle
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | On 18 May 2026, it was proposed that this article be moved from Red Rectangle Nebula to Red Rectangle. The result of the discussion was moved. |
HD 44179
Check out HD 44179. I propose a merge between both articles. Evilclown93 15:41, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
- Support: I think that Red Rectangle should be the main article and HD 44179 a redirect to it. WilliamKF 16:44, 10 February 2007 (UTC)
"Not to be confused with Red Square Nebula"
Is it just me that's confused, or did someone on Wikipedia confuse the Red Square Nebula with the Red Rectangle Nebula despite warnings against it? Photos on the two article pages look very similar to me, without any explanation given for it as far as I can see. --137.111.13.204 (talk) 18:04, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
- You're right. The photo on the Red Square page was of the Red Rectangle; I removed it, but haven't yet found a free photo of the Red Square (a non-free one had been removed 28 October 2015). Davemck (talk) 20:36, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Red Rectangle Nebula. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070731022458/http://spacescience.arc.nasa.gov/redglow/ to http://spacescience.arc.nasa.gov/redglow/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:24, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
Requested move 18 May 2026
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 05:49, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Red Rectangle Nebula → Red Rectangle – This nebula is commonly referred to as just the Red Rectangle, and is currently the primary topic for that term. The name "Red Rectangle" is also now officially listed by the IAU - though maybe it's intended to be only the name of the central star, which wouldn't make sense? SevenSpheres (talk) 18:07, 18 May 2026 (UTC)
- Support. This is a nebula that is named the 'Red Rectangle'; I've never seen 'Red Rectangle Nebula' except on Wikipedia. Modest Genius talk 19:07, 18 May 2026 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.