Talk:Retroscripting

Untitled

Don't the Christopher Guest "mockumentaries" also make use of this technique? --Do Not Talk About Feitclub (contributions) 15:15, 26 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Well.. no one.. escapes the.. from.. the f.. sk.. Alcatraz. --Isequals 04:34, 21 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

How does Family Guy retroscript? Shit's animated.--68.56.17.70 (talk) 01:04, 14 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

They have voice actors, although I doubt they retroscript to the same degree that Home Movies or Aqua Teen does, if at all. 172.190.38.125 (talk) 05:36, 31 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

I added a slew of references, all to the entries I made a while back. Was fun reading all those interviews. 01:26 September 23 2010 (soahc)

None of those sources even used the word. Leaving this reply just in case my edit summaries are overlooked. I’m not saying every source needs to use the exact words we use, but we haven’t even established it as a word with any meaning outside of the creators’ heads. —67.14.236.50 (talk) 05:00, 28 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

i believe people are confusing ad-libbed lines in a movie with retroscripting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.84.48.64 (talk) 01:31, 3 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

AFD nomination

I’ve left a request on WT:AFD with my rationale for nominating. In short, the only cited source that supports this term circles back to this article, and the sources I’ve found only use it in connection with a single cartoon. —67.14.236.50 (talk) 04:58, 9 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.