This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Libraries Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Libraries, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Libraries on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LibrariesWikipedia:WikiProject LibrariesTemplate:WikiProject LibrariesLibraries Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Higher education This article is within the scope of WikiProject Higher education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of higher education, universities, and colleges on Wikipedia. Please visit the project page to join the discussion, and see the project's article guideline for useful advice.Higher educationWikipedia:WikiProject Higher educationTemplate:WikiProject Higher educationHigher education Wales Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Wales, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Wales on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WalesWikipedia:WikiProject WalesTemplate:WikiProject WalesWales Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hi, User:Onel5969. I just wanted to flag with you that i have undone your recent edit, and kindly ask for some time to add additional sources to this article, which was deleted without discussion. Many thanks Jason.nlw (talk) 16:59, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. It had been tagged for over a week without improvement, which is why I redirected (which isn't actually deleting the article). I could not find any in-depth sourcing about the archive from independent sources, but you might have access to better sourcing. Being of Welsh heritage myself, am always interested in Welsh-related subjects. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:03, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

User:Onel5969 Thanks very much! also tagging User:Scope creep who re-did the redirect before I had a chance to work on the references. The archive is pretty important, holding the Special Collections of the oldest University in Wales so I really hope it can stay. I've added additional references to secondary sources, a few of which offer a more in-depth history of the collections and the people involved with it. Please please ping me with a warning, or any advice if this needs more work and I'll get to it as soon as possible. Jason.nlw (talk) 18:57, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Jason.nlw: Thats great. It doesn't seem to happen that often. scope_creep^Talk 18:59, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I've been doing a little work on the sourcing. Of the twenty-two sources now used, I think six (7/9/10/16/18/21) are directly linked to the subject. Arguably, another three (3/4/17) have some link as they are published by the University of Wales Press. The remainder are, I think, independent secondary sources. I'm wondering if this is sufficient to justify removing the Primary sources tag and would appreciate other views. I know Other Stuff Exists is a poor argument, but I do note that the Bodleian Library, rated B by the Libraries Project, has at least seventeen Bodleian.ox.ac.uk sources, and a lot more published by OUP.

Whilst I'm on, I wonder if this article would benefit from a Library infobox? Views? KJP1 (talk) 11:29, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]