Talk:Scantrust
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE. |
The Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use require that editors disclose their "employer, client, and affiliation" with respect to any paid contribution; see WP:PAID. For advice about reviewing paid contributions, see WP:COIRESPONSE.
|
Company description should be improved
Currently company intro reads as Scantrust "is a Swiss company that provides an Internet of things platform for identifying products on the internet." This description may have been referring to a specific feature that often appears alongside barcodes described as GTINs. GTINs "...are also used to identify products sold online."[1] It would be more accurate to say it's a "platform for placing identifiers on products to associate them with information on the internet." BirchManner (talk) 18:48, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
References
Article review
Following the first submission of the article, which was declined, I have made made a thorough review of the article and the sources used to establish notability. The discussion with editor User: DESiegel provides some context: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:DESiegel#Follow-up_on_your_comments_re._Draft_on_Scantrust
June 2020 bad sources
I have removed several sources that were paid promotion, for example Supplychaindive, where you can get your press release posted for $179. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 16:46, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Thank you for taking the time and making the modifications ThatMontrealIP, I appreciate it very much. One comment regarding the Supply Chain Dive source, despite that they accept press releases, there is an editorial team and the source [1] was clearly not paid promotion. In my view, it is a secondary source which makes an analysis and commentary regarding the company. May I ask if you could reconsider this source? Thank you, Factfox (talk) 18:32, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
- Nope. The copy in the article also looks like it was derived from a press release. "By using ScanTrust's cloud-based software, companies can keep track of their parts and products and identify weak spots in their supply chains." Either way, it's a lousy publisher. ThatMontrealIP (talk) 18:38, 26 June 2020 (UTC)
Feedback from New Page Review process
I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Good start..
North8000 (talk) 10:07, 13 July 2020 (UTC)
| This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest has now been answered. |
- What I think should be changed: The first sentence describing the company “Scantrust is a Swiss company that provides an Internet of things platform for identifying products on the internet.”
- Why it should be changed: “Identifying products on the internet” sounds confusing, it suggests online digital products, whereas Scantrust provides enterprise software for physical products with secure QR codes and traceability systems. A clearer and more accurate version would be:
“Scantrust is a Swiss company that provides enterprise software for product authentication and supply chain traceability.”
- References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button):
There are many references already included in the article which support this change, for example this one: https://phys.org/news/2015-05-combatting-counterfeiting-qr-codes.html
Also, the reference below states that "Scantrust has developed technology that expands on standard QR codes by adding secure serialization" [1]
Factfox (talk) 18:11, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
References
- ^ Fenton, Kevin; Simske, Steven; Luu, Jonathan (2023-01-24). "Mitigation of Chemical Reporting Liabilities through Systematic Modernization of Chemical Hazard and Safety Data Management Systems". American Chemical Society Omega. 8 (5).
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.

