Talk:Service Modeling Language
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
Links/Resources
Cem's comment below is not dated, so it may or may not apply, but I hope the prediction for a re-write holds true. This article is certainly in need of work. The consortium has been inactive for half a year and the W3C has taken over vetting the spec delivered by the consortium. It appears that the work group is close to declaring a 'last call'. With the dormancy of the consortium, those interested in using SML would do well to reference the draft on the W3C site, not the old consortium site, serviceml.org. I will try to find time to do some work on this. The information on SML itself in the article is not egregiously wrong or distorted, but I doubt that anyone really familiar with the current state of SML would be entirely comfortable. I will try to put some work in as I find time, but I just stumbled onto this and can't do it justice now. --Vinemaple 08:10, 3 November 2007 (UTC)
The part about models is not helping. This is just a general discussion and not specifically related to SML. Advseb 17:40, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Here is a link to an article about SML. Im not going to write anything for it right now beacuse the information about it isnt substantial enough. See Here--Altrock78 10:34, 1 August 2006 (UTC)
In a couple of weeks this should be streamlined and re-written. In the next weeks there will be some interesting new sources on this topic for sure. Until then this article is a stub resp. a collection of raw material. User:Cem Basman
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.