Talk:Shared-use path
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
US and EU terminology compared
I don't think we may categorise US terminology as 'different' to EU terminology yet when we don't actually have any sources. [The Cheshire County Council link is dead. Cycling in the Netherlands says they don't have shared use. So we have one picture from one location in Germany.] --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 09:57, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- But the ASHTO spec would describe the Milton Keynes redway system very well, apart from [ashto] having a better standard of signage. However, the redway system is still unusual in the UK, where painted bike lanes [or more likely nothing at all] on conventional roads are far more common. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 16:59, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
- Remind me where you saw "US terminology as 'different' to EU terminology" ? Also if I read the Netherlands article correctly, they generally have a separate pedestrian path wherever the cycle path is segregated.--agr (talk) 11:03, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
- Ah yes, not this article. It's in segregated cycle facility#Off road: sidepath / shared-use footway. So, using the US meaning of the word moot, my point is moot. :-( I'll have to re-argue the question there.
- re Netherlands, what I'm saying is that they don't have any shared paths so can't be given as an example as I had hoped. In actual fact, we don't yet have any documented examples outside the US. I'm still searching the web for some. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 23:27, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
- Remind me where you saw "US terminology as 'different' to EU terminology" ? Also if I read the Netherlands article correctly, they generally have a separate pedestrian path wherever the cycle path is segregated.--agr (talk) 11:03, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.