This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Education Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of education and education-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EducationWikipedia:WikiProject EducationTemplate:WikiProject Educationeducation Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This page will be a very well written page. I will finish it in the next day. Shared Reading is one piece of balanced literacy and should be left on Wikipedia. It will contain original research and once complete we can determine if it should stay or not. Thanks

I am in the process of writting this proposal for a site. It is a valid piece of balanced lieteracy and once complete I feel will be a viable site. Once done we can determine if it should be deleted.

Hi there, Wikipedia has a strict policy that orginal research is not suitable under any circumstances. If you'd like any further clarification drop a line on my talk page. •Elomis• 04:29, 15 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Please let me know if you have any concerns with this page at present. Thanks

Ok, that's an encyclopedia article now. I've removed the db tag. It's butchered pretty heavily, it contains most of the what section (which is highly relevant for an encyclopdeia) but not much of the why part, because an encyclopedia is typically less concerned with why things exist (except for scientific articles, "why does X happen" etc.) Is there any way you can tie the citations into the article properly? They look at the moment like they support an opinion rather than stand as citations for fact. •Elomis• 20:13, 15 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

I will look at it over the next few days and see what I can do. Take care.