Talk:Stephen Colbert/GA2
GA Review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Mr. R00t Talk 02:56, 11 November 2010 (UTC)
I'll do the reviewing of this article. I'll get started sometime soon (15-30 minutes).
Overview
Things are mostly good. I'm using the template below to do this review as it is a lot easier.
Text
Are all of his siblings dead? If not this should be in present tense (are vs. were).Colbert children- When reading this you assume that the article means Stephen Colbert's children, not his siblings."In interviews, Colbert has described his parents as devout..." would read better as "In interviews, Colbert describes his parents as devout...".Fourth paragraph about plane crash- This reads rather oddly. I'm not sure if this is a BRITENG or something else. (What is this written in American English? I can't really tell.
Awards and honorsStephen Colbert#The Colbert Report should be longer, this is, mainly, what he is famous for.- His work is referenced to in other sections, the section explains his work substantially without taking over the purpose of the other article. —Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм • Champagne? • 4:08pm • 05:08, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
GA Criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
Dates are not in the correct format WP:MoS#Dates.Fixed.
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
Per comment by Racepacket.Fixed. Article is now ready to be a GA.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail: Updating this after I posted it.
Done
- Pass or Fail:
Comments
Breadth of Coverage: Any thought to having a section of the article listing critics comments on his work? I know his White House Correspondents' Dinner was not well-received. Also, although I personally enjoyed his 2010 Congressional testimony and thought that it was worthy of "C-Span 1", there were a number of critical reviews. Racepacket (talk) 21:20, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
- Done See this diff —Ғяіᴆaз'§Đøøм • Champagne? • 4:04pm • 05:04, 13 November 2010 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.