Talk:Study Club fire
 | A fact from Study Club fire appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 13 April 2010. The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
will add info from here tmmrw [1]Ottawa4ever (talk) 20:52, 6 April 2010 (UTC)
Propose deleting Aftermath section
There's really nothing here to do with the aftermath. A reference in a 1971 safety manual seems a desperate stretch, and noting that there are not many reliable sources of information violates WP:OR. An institution categorizing damage as "significant" doesn't really count as aftermath. It's just a description, and a vague one. Any opposition to deletion? InedibleHulk (talk) 18:11, 28 May 2012 (UTC)
- opposed The NFPA description is just fine as an aftermath to add some significance without stretch, you can look for other sources if you want to improve the section; rather than deleting it. Ottawa4ever (talk) 12:44, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
- No, I'll just leave it alone. It isn't a big deal to me, one way or another. If nobody had objected, I'd have deleted it, but that's why I asked. InedibleHulk (talk) 13:27, 30 May 2012 (UTC)
Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Ozone Disco fire which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 01:01, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.