Talk:The Inbetweeners 2
 | The Inbetweeners 2 has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: May 20, 2015. (Reviewed version). |
 | A fact from The Inbetweeners 2 appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 9 July 2015 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
Plot
First of all. It is over long. And per WP:FILMPLOT, it should be between 400 and 700 words. And since when did Wikipedia ever show images in the plot from the film itself? They aren't even neatly put in, and it looks a little messy. I think they should all go, or just two of them. But the plot needs to cut down. If anyone wants to do so, feel free to. Or I will myself Charlr6 (talk) 17:38, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
- I removed the images per policy and removed jokey trivial bits in the plot. A bit more to do though! '''tAD''' (talk) 18:09, 7 August 2014 (UTC)
GA Review
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:The Inbetweeners 2/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 20:50, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
Oh well, someone needs to do this, I guess ;) I hope to be able to review it this weekend. Zwerg Nase (talk) 20:50, 15 May 2015 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Everything that bothered me, I took care of myself. So it's a pass. Congratulations! :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:06, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.