This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Psychology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Medicine: Neurology Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the Neurology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Trail Making Test. PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles) The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine. Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers. This article contains broken links to one or more target anchors: [[Attention#Visual attention|visual attention]] The anchor (#Visual attention) has been deleted by other users before. The anchors may have been removed, renamed, or are no longer valid. Please fix them by following the link above, checking the page history of the target pages, or updating the links. Remove this template after the problem is fixed | Report an error

This edit request by an editor with a conflict of interest was declined. Some or all of the changes may be promotional in tone.

Disclosure: I am the owner of whats-your-iq.com, a free educational website that hosts an open archive of public-domain historical IQ tests. Per WP:COI I am not editing this article directly and am posting this {{edit request}} for an independent editor's review. COI disclosure is on my user page.

Proposed addition (to the existing "External links" section):

* [https://whats-your-iq.com/en/historical-iq-tests/trail-making-test-1944 Trail Making Test archive page] - whats-your-iq.com free in-browser version of both Part A and Part B with original 1944 US Army Individual Test Battery context. The Trail Making Test was originally a US-government-authored battery item and is in the public domain. Free educational resource.

Rationale: The Trail Making Test was authored as part of the 1944 US Army Individual Test Battery, making it public domain as a federal-government work. The current External Links section already cites the free computer-based research PEBL version. A second free in-browser version is genuinely useful, particularly since the WYI version documents the original 1944 administration and the 1949 Partington and Leiter publication.

Per WP:ELNO I confirm:

• The link is to a free, public-domain resource (not paywalled).
• The link is a substantive supplement to the article (not a duplicate of the existing PEBL link, since the WYI version is browser-based vs PEBL's downloadable software).
• The link is not primarily promotional.
• If an independent editor judges this fails ELNO, please decline this request and I will not re-post.

~2026-33483-34 (talk) 11:30, 6 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Authorship clarification: I (User:Baycanemir) authored the edit request immediately above. The submission was made through an API call that briefly returned to a temporary-user session before the username attribution could be confirmed; the content, COI disclosure, and signature in the disclosure all refer to my account. Independent editors should treat the request as if posted by Baycanemir. Apologies for the technical confusion.

Baycanemir (talk) 11:32, 6 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi Baycanemir, and thank you for your suggestion. I am declining this edit request for the same reasons I gave at Talk:Bender-Gestalt Test. In addition, the link that you provided returned a 404 error when I reviewed it. Altamel (talk) 15:21, 6 June 2026 (UTC)Reply

Hi Altamel, thank you for the review. I have posted a substantive reply to the decline reasoning at Talk:Bender-Gestalt Test#Edit request: External Links section addition (1938 monograph) (specifically addressing the WP:ELNO #5 finding and offering to adjust the source page UI). To keep the discussion in one place, I am pointing here rather than re-stating the argument. Baycanemir (talk) 15:39, 6 June 2026 (UTC)Reply