Talk:UCPH Department of Computer Science
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the UCPH Department of Computer Science article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
[Untitled]
How about removing the discussion about the english name of DIKU? At the very least remove it from the first section of the article, which should IMO be reserved for more generel info. The english name used on DIKU's homepage is "Department of Computer Science", so clearly that is the name we should use. It is mentioned that the name have been debated. Is that a generel Danish-English translation debate (1), or is it specific to DIKU (2)? In the (1) case we should definently remove it, in the (2) case we might keep a note further down in the article.
I am just going to remove the fact that computer science shares links with mathematics. The discussion or statement of that fact belongs in the article about computer science.
Thue 21:17, 18 Sep 2003 (UTC)
On January 15, 2006, user:Ceyockey recommended merging Bioinformatics Centre, a department in the University of Copenhagen Faculty of Science back with the main page. I decided to nominate merging all the other sub-departments back into the main article, as they are all stubs, and none of them, with the possible exception of the Niels Bohr institute, assert independent notability. They also don't have any incoming links except from the University of Copenhangen wiki articles. The only comment was from the author of the pages, who objected. I don't really care enough to force the issue, so I'm going to remove all the merge tags and let someone else deal with it in the future if someone comes along who cares more than I do. Thatcher131 21:05, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
Is DIKU associated with the "diku-type" online game? Wdarkk 00:48, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Yea, diku mud originated at diku, as the article states.--Per Abrahamsen 10:43, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:DIKU logo.png

Image:DIKU logo.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 23:01, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Ørestad
Is the plan to move the institute to Ørestad still in effect? AmirOnWiki (talk) 15:37, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.