Talk:Uber
| Greyball was merged into this article. The discussion was closed on 19 March 2022 with a consensus to merge. The original page is now a redirect to this article. Its history now serves to provide attribution for the content in this article, and it must not be deleted as long as this article exists. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Uber article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2, 3Auto-archiving period: 6 months |
| The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When editing this article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve it, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, use the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
| This article was nominated for deletion on 20 February 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
| This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Wiki Education assignment: Computer Science Principles
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 29 March 2022 and 19 June 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): MarshWicker (article contribs).
Trademark disputes of uber
Can someone help add the section on trademark disputes for Uber? I have a good article explaining it. https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/uber-hit-with-trademark-lawsuit-over-new-travel-services-2022-05-12/ WikiGrower1 (talk) 14:58, 27 December 2025 (UTC)
NPOV structure, proposed regrouping
As the article stands, we have flat history chronology with no subheadings, and it's an NPOV problem, not just a readability one.
A few examples:
- "In January 2022, Uber acquired Australian car-sharing company Car Next Door." The next paragraph is a leak of 124,000 internal documents.
- DOJ criminal charges against the former Chief Security Officer for obstruction of justice. Then immediately followed by the 2040 carbon-neutrality pledge. Consecutive paragraphs, comparable length.
- A gold membership in the Linux Foundation gets its own paragraph. So does an $271.8M class action settlement.
This isn't just difficult to navigate. It's scattering related material all over the place.
Significant regulatory, labour, and safety material is interleaved with routine acquisition announcements and minor corporate milestones, and so on. These are items of very different weight reading at the same level, a clear violation of WP:WEIGHT, and ultimately WP:SUMMARYSTYLE and WP:STRUCTURE:
Watch out for structural or stylistic aspects that make it difficult for a reader to fairly and equally assess the credibility of all relevant and related viewpoints.
Related material that recurs in multiple places like this makes it difficult to follow any one thread and actively works against NPOV.
When the record on these events is this extensive and significant, the undifferentiated dating is actively diluting it. We have driver classification issues sprinkled across five separate places, data breaches in four, regulatory evasion in three, all scattered across three thousand words of history, and the reader is structurally prevented from following any of this material end to end at all.
A very sophisticated POV push, and it's completely unreadable.
I propose that content should be grouped along these lines:
- History - founding and early growth (2009-2013). Expansion and regulatory conflict (2013–2017). Leadership change and restructuring (2017–2019). Public company (2019–present)
- Operations - Services. Business model. Autonomous vehicles.
- Legal and regulatory issues - Driver classification. Regulatory evasion. Data privacy and breaches. Consumer protection. Passenger safety litigation.
- Corporate culture
- Finances
To be clear on the structure point: these subsections are organized by subject, not by stance. Company responses would stay folded into the relevant narrative rather than being answered back at in a separate passage, as it should be. tofubird | ✉ 06:44, 8 August 2026 (UTC)
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.

