Talk:XHTML Friends Network

Semantic web query

Latest comment: 20 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

isn't this similar to semantic web?

It contributes to the Semantic web, but is only complementary, it does not replace the Semantic Web. --Vincent 10:57, 24 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Criticisms of XFN

I think this article should have a section on criticisms of XFN.

Examples

<a href="https://artikeldigital.com/en/http://alice.example.org" rel="sweetheart">
<a href="https://artikeldigital.com/en/http://bob.example.org" rel="sibling">
<a href="https://artikeldigital.com/en/http://charlie.example.org" rel="parent">
<a href="https://artikeldigital.com/en/http://dave.example.org" rel="neighbor">
<a href="https://artikeldigital.com/en/http://emma.example.org" rel="co-worker">
Latest comment: 19 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The introduction section looks like it was copied verbatim from http://gmpg.org/xfn/intro — deathlime 10:47, 14 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

microformat?

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I couldn't find a single mention of the word "microformat" on the XFN homepage, although XFN obviously is a microformat. Why don't they use that term? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.162.15.87 (talk) 19:10, August 20, 2007 (UTC)

I think the link to the irc channel should be removed, I entered and no one was there, only me. I also think that some examples should be added like mentioned. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.127.76.139 (talk) 21:24, 13 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

WordPress?

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I don't know enough about it, but I am sure WordPress uses XFN in their 'links' section in the software. Should this be mentioned as an important implementation (millions of blogs worldwide)? Blonkm (talk) 05:23, 17 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.