Share to: share facebook share twitter share wa share telegram print page

Teacher of Righteousness

Page from the Damascus Document

The Teacher of Righteousness (Hebrew: מורה הצדק, romanizedmore haṣṣeḏeq) is a mysterious figure found in some of the Dead Sea Scrolls at Qumran, most prominently in the Damascus Document.[1] This document speaks briefly of the origins of the sect, probably Essenes, 390 years after the Neo-Babylonian Empire captured Jerusalem in 586 BCE. After another 20 years of study and waiting, "God... raised for them a Teacher of Righteousness to guide them in the way of His heart".[2]

The Teacher is extolled as having a proper understanding of the Torah, qualified in its accurate instruction (i.e. an inspired interpreter of the prophets, as the one "to whom God made known all the mysteries of the words of his servants the prophets" – 1QpHab 7:5) and being the one through whom God would reveal to the community "the hidden things in which Israel had gone astray".[3]

Although the exact identity of the Teacher is unknown, based on the text of the Community Rule, the teachers of the sect are identified as Kohanim (priests) of patrilineal progeny of Zadok[4] (the first high priest to serve in Solomon's Temple), leading scholars to conclude the Teacher was a priest of Zadokite lineage.[4]

Identity

The missing High Priest of 159–152 BC

One theory initially advocated by Jerome Murphy-O'Connor[5] and subsequently by Stegemann is that the Teacher of Righteousness served as High Priest but was subsequently ousted by Jonathan Apphus. In 1 Maccabees, no High Priest is named for the period from the death of Alcimus in 159 BC to the claiming of the position of High Priest by Jonathan on the authority of Alexander Balas in 152 BC (1 Macc 10:18–20). From this, it could be concluded that there was no High Priest for these years, and indeed Josephus, drawing heavily on 1 Maccabees at this point in his history, comes to that conclusion (Ant. 20.237). It is improbable, however, that the office remained completely vacant for these years. Stegemann suggests that the reason that nothing is said in 1 Maccabees about a High Priest between Alcimus and Jonathan was apologetic: to conceal the fact that the Hasmoneans obtained the High Priesthood by usurping it from its rightful holder, the Teacher of Righteousness.[6] Alvar Ellegård follows this line and argues that the Teacher of Righteousness was not only the leader of the Essenes at Qumran, but was also considered something of a precursor to Jesus Christ about 150 years before the time of the Gospels.[7] In 1965, the Dead Sea Scrolls document known as Melchizedek, dated to around 100 BCE, revealed that the Essenes were waiting for this Melchizedek (מַלְכִּי־צֶדֶק‎, romanized: malkī-ṣeḏeq, 'King of Righteousness') High Priest and King Messiah. The Essenes also wrote in this document that they knew the time of his appearing due to the prophecies written in Daniel.

Critics of this theory accuse it of being too hypothetical:[citation needed] slotting the Teacher as High Priest into a convenient gap during which no other High Priest is recorded in the few sources available. Neither the Damascus Document nor 1QS or 4QMMT suggest that the legitimacy of the High Priest was an issue for the split. In addition, the motivation behind the split of the sect from mainstream Judaism appears to have been of a religious rather than political nature.[citation needed]

A 1st-century BCE Messiah figure

Michael O. Wise posits that the Teacher of Righteousness was the "first messiah", a figure predating Jesus by roughly 100 years.[8] This figure, who Wise believes was named Judah, rose to prominence during the reign of Alexander Jannaeus, and had been a priest and confidant to the king. However, he became dissatisfied with the religious sects in Jerusalem and, in reaction, founded a "crisis cult". While amassing a following, the Teacher (and his followers) claimed he was the fulfillment of various Biblical prophecies, with an emphasis on those found in the Book of Isaiah. The religious leadership in Jerusalem eventually killed the Teacher, and his followers hailed him as a messianic figure who had been exalted to the presence of God's throne. They then anticipated that the Teacher would return to judge the wicked and lead the righteous into a golden age, which would take place within the next forty years. Wise explains that dating of manuscript copies among the Dead Sea Scrolls shows that the Teacher's postmortem following drastically increased in size over several years, but that when the predicted return and golden age failed to materialize his following dissipated rapidly.

A Sadducee priest

Other documents from the Dead Sea Scrolls portray the Teacher as involved in a heavy conflict against a figure termed the "Wicked Priest," which has led to several proposals for their identity: a Sadducee (Zadokite) priest as the Teacher, possibly even the legitimate High Priest, against a "wicked" Jonathan Apphus. "Zadok" translates as "righteous" in Hebrew.

Hyrcanus II

Along these lines is the proposal that Hyrcanus II was the Teacher of Righteousness. This was proposed in 2013 by Gregory Doudna. Hyrcanus was High Priest from 76 to 67 BCE and 63 to 40 BCE. According to Doudna, Hyrcanus II’s sectarian orientation is generally understood as Sadducee. Further, according to this hypothesis, Antigonus II Mattathias would have been seen as the Wicked Priest. Antigonus was the last Hasmonean king. He ruled only for three years and was executed by the Romans in 37 BCE. Antigonus was supported by the Pharisees.[9]

Hillel against Shammai

Rabbi Harvey Falk identifies Hillel the Elder as the Teacher against a "wicked" Shammai, a significant conflict mentioned in the Jerusalem Talmud, Shabbat 1:4.[10] Most scholars date the Damascus Document and many of the Dead Sea scrolls to the decades around the year 100 BCE, vastly predating Hillel and Shammai.

James is Jesus, Teacher of Righteousness

Robert Eisenman has proposed the historical Jesus was James, brother of Jesus the Nazarene, the Teacher of Righteousness against the Wicked Priest Ananus ben Ananus, and a "Spouter of Lies" whom Eisenman identifies as Paul the Apostle.[11][12] This theory is rejected by mainstream scholarship, as the Dead Sea scrolls date to around 100 BCE, predating James by almost 200 years.

Judah the Essene

Stephen Goranson suggests that Judah the Essene, mentioned by Josephus, is the Teacher.[13]

John the Baptist

Barbara Thiering questions the dating of the Dead Sea Scrolls and suggests that the Teacher of Righteousness preached a future fiery judgment, has said "the axe is laid to the roots of the tree," called people "vipers," practiced baptism and lived in the wilderness of Judea. Due to these reasons, she believes there is a strong possibility that the Teacher of Righteousness was John the Baptist.[14] Her belief is based on the idea that the Dead Sea Scrolls were written in code.

More than one Teacher of Righteousness

Richard A. Freund writes, "The difference of opinion over the positioning of the Teacher of Righteousness leads me to conclude that perhaps all of these researchers are correct. A Teacher of Righteousness did lead the group in the second century BCE when it was established. Another Teacher of Righteousness led the sect in the first century BCE and finally another Teacher emerged in the first century CE."[15]

References

  1. ^ (CD)
  2. ^ (CD 1:9–11)
  3. ^ (CD 3:12–15)
  4. ^ a b Serech HaYachad text – Sod H'Megilloth (B.T. Katz) p. 22
  5. ^ Jerome Murphy-O'Connor, "Teacher of Righteousness", Anchor Bible Dictionary VI, p340f
  6. ^ H. Stegemann, The Library of Qumran: On the Essenes, Qumran, John the Baptist, and Jesus. Grand Rapids MI, 1998
  7. ^ Alvar Ellegård; Jesus—One Hundred Years Before Christ: A Study In Creative Mythology, London (1999). ISBN 0-87951-720-4
  8. ^ Michael O. Wise, The First Messiah: Investigating the Savior Before Christ, HarperCollins 1999
  9. ^ Doudna, Gregory L. (2013). "A Narrative Argument that the Teacher of Righteousness was Hyrcanus II". In Stacey, David; Doudna, Gregory L.; Avni, Gideon (eds.). Qumran Revisited: A Reassessment of the Archaeology of the Site and Its Texts. Oxford: Archaeopress. p. 94-107. ISBN 978-1-4073-1138-8.
  10. ^ Falk, Harvey (2003). Jesus the Pharisee: A New Look at the Jewishness of Jesus. Wipf and Stock Publishers. p. 53f. ISBN 978-1-59244-313-0.
  11. ^ James the Brother of Jesus, Penguin, 1997–98, pp. 51–153 and 647–816.
  12. ^ "Robert Eisenman's The New Testament Code: The Cup of the Lord, the Damascus Covenant, and the Blood of Christ".
  13. ^ The significance of Sinai: traditions about Sinai and divine ed. George J. Brooke, Hindy Najman, Loren T. Stuckenbruck – 2008 p. 123 footnote: "Greek word 'Εσσενοι'", see Stephen Goranson, "Jannaeus, His Brother Absalom, and Judah the Essene" self-published on-line paper http://www.duke.edu/~goranson/jannaeus.pdf
  14. ^ "The Riddle of the Dead Sea Scrolls". YouTube - Discovery Channel documentary. 1990. Retrieved 4 March 2022.
  15. ^ Freund,Richard A (2009) Digging through the Bible: modern archaeology and the ancient Bible Rowman & Littlefield ISBN 978-0742546455 p. 287
Kembali kehalaman sebelumnya