CSS1?
Why Template:CSS1 instead of just Template:CSS? --Execvator (talk) 13:42, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2008-04-10T13:42:00.000Z","author":"Execvator","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Execvator-2008-04-10T13:42:00.000Z-CSS1?","replies":[]}}-->
Because it has already existed... --Sky6t (talk) 17:31, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-03-22T17:31:00.000Z","author":"Sky6t","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Sky6t-2012-03-22T17:31:00.000Z-CSS1?","replies":[]}}-->
Whilst not challenging the basic notability of Dynamic CSS, I would question if this obscure (and IMHO, usually wrong-headed) technique has the sort of major-league significance that warrants it being the lead link in the {{CSS}} sidebar nav template? Andy Dingley (talk) 15:39, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2012-06-26T15:39:00.000Z","author":"Andy Dingley","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Andy_Dingley-2012-06-26T15:39:00.000Z-Dynamic_CSS,_and_inclusion_on_a_sidebar_nav_template?","replies":["c-Anton.bersh-2021-03-16T20:33:00.000Z-Andy_Dingley-2012-06-26T15:39:00.000Z"]}}-->
- As of now (9 years later), this link has been removed from the template (not by me). If anyone reading this is interested, I nominated that page for deletion: Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Dynamic_cascading_style_sheets_(2nd_nomination).
- Anton.bersh (talk) 20:33, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2021-03-16T20:33:00.000Z","author":"Anton.bersh","type":"comment","level":2,"id":"c-Anton.bersh-2021-03-16T20:33:00.000Z-Andy_Dingley-2012-06-26T15:39:00.000Z","replies":[]}}-->