This template is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Discworld, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.DiscworldWikipedia:WikiProject DiscworldTemplate:WikiProject DiscworldDiscworld
remove headings for 'illustrated' and 'young adult'
While it is true that some books have been illustrated, and others have been classified as young adult, I don't think these distinctions are large enough to justify the extra space (mostly white) that they require in the template (and every page the template is on). Perhaps on this template, these books can be merged into the general list? The Gomm23:41, 1 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Comment this is the result of a wrong-way merger in 2009. I don't see why it was ever done that way. They should have merged the two to the requested destination instead of this template. -- 70.51.202.113 (talk) 05:55, 16 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Same reason as when I declined the speedy. A move would require a history swap and addition of a copied template, and for what benefit? The template title is perfectly fine as it is. Jenks24 (talk) 10:27, 23 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
If you've got recommendations for additional secondary sources that could be utilized to further improve the quality of the article, please suggest them at Talk:Lie-to-children.
Sorry to be a bother, but should the Discworld template have so many entries for 'Races and Creatures'? The only one that refers to an individual article is 'Nac Mac Feegle', while all others link to Discworld (world). Also, while Dragons, Dwarfs, Elves, Orcs, Goblins, Igors etc. all have Discworld books centred around them, Centaurs, Fauns, Gnolls, Gorgons, and Kvetch are all only briefly mentioned as one-off jokes; we never actually encounter a named character from one of these races. (I am working from the Discworld & Pratchett Wiki here). Doesn't having all of these ephemeral references confuse the Template, especially when the article they link to doesn't mention them? OldSwinburne (talk) 19:00, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]