This template is within the scope of WikiProject British Royalty (a child project of the Royalty and Nobility Work Group), an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to British Royalty on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you should visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.British RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject British RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject British RoyaltyBritish royalty articles
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONDESKTOP__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Dunarc-2019-11-24T14:46:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Churchill:_The_Hollywood_Years-2019-11-24T14:46:00.000Z","replies":["c-Dunarc-2019-11-24T14:46:00.000Z-Churchill:_The_Hollywood_Years"],"text":"Churchill: The Hollywood Years","linkableTitle":"Churchill: The Hollywood Years"}-->
__DTSUBSCRIBEBUTTONMOBILE__{"headingLevel":2,"name":"h-Dunarc-2019-11-24T14:46:00.000Z","type":"heading","level":0,"id":"h-Churchill:_The_Hollywood_Years-2019-11-24T14:46:00.000Z","replies":["c-Dunarc-2019-11-24T14:46:00.000Z-Churchill:_The_Hollywood_Years"],"text":"Churchill: The Hollywood Years","linkableTitle":"Churchill: The Hollywood Years"}-->
I have added Churchill: The Hollywood Years to the Film and Television section of cultural depictions as George VI, played by Harry Enfield is an important figure in the film. However I am in two minds about whether or not this should be here given that it is a parody with little relevance to reality and would be happy to hear other opinions. My reasons for (which on balance I think outweigh the reasons against) are that this film does include a notable cultural deception of George VI and other templates do feature similar content. The example it would give is the inclusion of the very similar TV film The Hunt for Tony Blair in Template:Tony Blair. In both the depictions are obvious parodies which are clearly not meant to be taken seriously. On the other hand the George VI here bears almost no resemblance to reality and everything else in the template is a film or TV production which would consider itself to be based on fact. So if anyone does think its inclusion is wrong, I am happy to discuss. Dunarc (talk) 14:46, 24 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]__DTELLIPSISBUTTON__{"threadItem":{"timestamp":"2019-11-24T14:46:00.000Z","author":"Dunarc","type":"comment","level":1,"id":"c-Dunarc-2019-11-24T14:46:00.000Z-Churchill:_The_Hollywood_Years","replies":[]}}-->