Template talk:Sontaran stories

This template does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Doctor Who This template is within the scope of WikiProject Doctor Who, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Doctor Who and its spin-offs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this notice, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Doctor WhoWikipedia:WikiProject Doctor WhoTemplate:WikiProject Doctor WhoDoctor Who Television This template is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. For how to use this banner template, see its documentation.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision

In regard to this edit - why shouldn't we have them till they have aired. This information is already on the serials page, and we will put on just about every other page when we have titles - so why not here? I can understand not having them till we have a title, but I can't understand not having them till they have aired. (and please don't bring up WP:CRYSTAL - see here). StuartDD _{contributions} 10:59, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, we know 1 episode title now, so that's enough for me to support having the entry in - as per the Dalek Template last year. StuartDD _{contributions} 15:59, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Sontarans are going to be in the last story in SJA. Publicity has stated that the brig will return in a sontaran story - see, for example, A brief history of time (Travel) (scroll to Making History under series 2)129.215.149.98 (talk) 11:31, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

They had a minor apperence in a picture in The God Complex — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.109.139.104 (talk) 19:49, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]