Ten Years to Save the West is a memoir of the former British prime ministerLiz Truss, published on 16 April 2024,[1] by Biteback Publishing in the United Kingdom and Regnery Publishing in the United States.[2] The UK edition is subtitled "Lessons from the Only Conservative in the Room". The US edition is subtitled "Leading the Revolution Against Globalism, Socialism, and the Liberal Establishment".
The book contains Truss's account of her meetings with various heads of state and government, including her meeting with Elizabeth II two days before the monarch's death, with Truss claiming to want to see a global "conservative movement revival".[3] Truss wrote the book herself without the use of a ghostwriter.[4] The book was announced by Truss on the social media platform X.[2][5][6] She promoted it by speaking at the Heritage Foundation in Washington, D.C. and by giving television interviews.[7]
In the section about her time as Prime Minister, Truss talks about the difficulties she had living at 10 Downing Street, saying that the role involves presidential responsibility but without the necessary support.[12] She describes her reaction to the death of Queen Elizabeth II, which she summarises as "Why me? Why now?"[10] The closing chapter of the book consists of "important lessons we can learn so we can win". She calls for "the leftist state" to be dismantled and for conservatism to triumph "across the free world".[13] She proposes dismantling the United Nations, the World Trade Organisation and the World Health Organisation.[14]
Controversies
According to the Cabinet Office, the book violated the Radcliffe rules, which limit what former ministers can publish in their memoirs. Truss shared a draft of the book with the Cabinet Office to be vetted, but the office did not give full approval for the final wording. In particular, the book disclosed conversations with the Queen, which the rules prohibit.[15][16][17][18] According to a spokesperson, Truss believed her breach of confidentiality was in the public interest.[16][17]
The book received predominantly negative reviews. Critics, including those politically sympathetic to Truss (The Times and The Telegraph), described the book as detached from reality, self-serving,[9][12] and revealing a lack of comprehension regarding the gravity of the situation during Truss's premiership.[23]
Patrick Maguire in The Times criticised the book as tedious and muddled, raising interesting questions but offering confusing or contradictory answers to them.[14] For British conservatives, Maguire said, the book is "worth enduring". The Independent awarded one out of five stars, calling the book "one giant whinge" that inverted the facts about Truss's career in order to portray her as having done nothing wrong. The Telegraph gave the book four out of five stars, contrasting it against the "snoozefest" memoirs of other politicians. The review agreed with Truss's assessment that left-wing values had been absorbed into the British establishment, but described the author herself as lacking in self-awareness.[12]
David Gauke, a former Member of Parliament in the Conservative party, argued that the lessons to be learned from the book are not the ones that Truss herself draws. He interpreted the book as a story, not of powerful vested interests, but of a politician with "a simplistic mindset and a reckless temperament" who achieved little in her political offices. A similar assessment was given by Tom Peck in The Times, who said Truss "appears psychiatrically incapable" of learning from her own experiences.[24]
Andrew Rawnsley, writing for The Guardian, described it as an "unintentionally hilarious" book characterised by intense self-pity combined with a lack of self-reflection. He said it only has appeal as a cautionary tale of zealotry.[10] Stuart Jeffries, also from The Guardian, called the book "unstoppably self-serving" and "cliche-ridden", saying that its purpose, like that of many other political memoirs, is to rewrite history for the benefit of an author unable to accept responsibility.[25]John Crace, in his satire "49 Days to Make a Mess", provided a digested version.[26]