User:Apisite

Hi, everyone. My hub is at the Wiktionary. When it comes to parental rights and family freedom, though, I acknowledge the existence of Antoine Béchamp's cellular theory.

As a citizen religiologist, I don't take seriously the camp against "cults/sects" (used as a term of abuse against unpopular religious movements), because for one thing, inter alia, the term "criminal religious movement" is a more accurate and useful category than the category "cults/sects" could ever be. Couldn't we agree, besides, that ostracizing persons of certain religious communities (henotheistic or otherwise) and having the reflexive urge to denigrate such people is not generally a sign of good character?

Furthermore, what would you rather do and where would you rather be, whether online or offline?

It feels disappointing, on those grounds, that Bitter Winter got designated as "generally unreliable" - as if doing an apologia for one new religious movement or more were politically incorrect; such a designation has to be nothing less than pseudovirtuously unfair.

Userboxes

This user is a woman.
This user lives in the U.S. State of Idaho.
This user is proud to be a
Michiganian !
This user is interested in the U.S. State of Michigan.
This user is interested in the U.S. State of North Dakota.
This user contributes using Mozilla Firefox.
該用戶認為漢字簡化破壞了漢字之美。
This user thinks that the beauty of Chinese characters is ruined by simplifying them.
This user was born in the Year of the Rooster.雞
Fri.This user is a Guinea pig
8/5 - 9/1This user is a Hazel, or a Knower.

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.