User:Gettingtoit/Press Coverage
LA Times May 8
" The Conflict in Iraq; PIETY AND POWER; Shiite Muslims, a majority in Iraq who were oppressed under Saddam Hussein's rule, savor new religious freedom and political clout."
At the end of this very long 2800 word featured article, "Sources: Congressional Research Service, Center for History and New Media, understanding-islam.com, Times reporting, Wikipedia, CIA World Factbook"
Omaha World-Herald May 8
In an article about Kingdom of Heaven, a paragraph size recap of the crusades is provided citing only wikipedia as the source.
"Crusades chronicle
Here is a quick recap of the first four Crusades. There may have been as many as 16, though not all
...
conquered the Orthodox Christian city of Constantinople, capital of the Byzantine Empire Source: http://en.wikipedia.org"
The Commercial Appeal (Memphis, TN) May 6
A blurb about the pros and cons of the ID argument citing Wikipedia as the only source:
Evolution debate
The thinking on intelligent design:
Pro: Intelligent design is a controversial set of arguments which assert that evidence supports the conclusion that life on Earth was deliberately designed by one or more intelligent agents. Advocates argue that the standard scientific model of evolution by natural selection is insufficient because Earth is too complex.
Con: Critics regard the theory as thinly disguised creationism. The most common response is to simply reject the claims of intelligent design as being scientifically illegitimate. The National Academy of Sciences calls it "pseudoscience."
Source: Wikipedia
Wyoming Tribune-Eagle May 8
Wikipedia cited in as a source in a lengthy featured article about old car restoration.
Kansas City Star May 4
According to www.wikipedia.org, "Many consider the books' versions of events to be definitive, because they are the final versions Adams produced (and also the most readily accessible)." Hitchhiker Guid article
Content Disclaimer
Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.
- The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
- There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
- It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
- Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
- Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.