I will follow the admin recall procedure listed as the modified RFC at User:Lar/Accountability, except for I have my own eligibility requirements, listed below. New requests for recall should go at the bottom of this page.

Those that are excluded by these requirements, but have a legitimate say in the issue, can make their case to myself or the clerk, who can waive any eligibility requirement.

Anyone who initiates or votes to support a recall petition or vote in the modified RfC must be able to show dedication to the project. This can be done by being able to show:

1. A user account in good standing for at least 6 months (no blocks, not subject to editing restrictions imposed by Arbcom, RfC, etc.)
2. At least 500 article space contributions
3. Administrators cannot vote or opine unless they are also open to recall. Listing oneself at CAT:AOR is irrelevant to this requirement. Any admin signer must have on their Userpage or talk (either directly or via link) a commitment to follow an administrator recall procedure where the resignation of administrator privileges is based on the consensus of peers. (I.E. "Convince Jimbo that I should give up the bit" does not count.) The commitment must have been made prior to the event that resulted in the recall petition being initiated.

• Administrative action that resulted in petition (user block, user unblock, page protection, etc.):
• Date incident occurred:
• Grievance:

I agree with the reasons given by the original signer to this recall petition and have met the eligibility requirements above:

1. <Username here> <if administrator, include link to commitment to admin recall procedure here> <optional: comments or supporting evidence>
2. <Username here> <if administrator, include link to commitment to admin recall procedure here> <optional: comments or supporting evidence>

This section is for those who are not eligible to vote, oppose the petition or do not wish to vote, but nonetheless wish to be heard

1. <Username here> <optional: comments or evidence>