User:Shenme


Is there yet a general realization that Wikipedia is a proud shining obelisk inscribed with much knowledge in all the scripts of the world, but made of chalk and drenched in a corrosive continual acid rain?

This makes me rather happy. You can call me 'hey', or you can call me 'Ray', or you can call me 'Fay', but I'll call you 'they' until I know you better.


There is the story of a Chinese poet who became engrossed in weighing which word they should use in a poem, whether it should be "knock at" or "push at" the door. Re-told with various elaborations, they usually do not denigrate the questioning - which is the better expression? 反复推敲


My favorite quote, that correlates what I hear and read, with what I feel, and what I hope:

I'm a pessimist about probabilities; I'm an optimist about possibilities.
Lewis Mumford (1895-1990)


Sigh... "full-proofed"


I'm afraid this edit best describes my attention to detail, which is mostly involuntary. It just leapt out at me!


Is there *any* logic to this?


Interesting, and a Wiki! AllSetLearning Grammar Wiki


The results of IP edits are 'sometimes' less than ideal, but then one comes along that fixes something broken for over two years. "But the article's name is just 'Beetle', not Beetles" says the one with new eyes. Err, umm, thanks. Really!!


Lately I've been on a run of correcting spelling mistakes. Lest anyone think that I think English spelling is 'rational', I'll point to my Page at Simple English Wikipedia

Lists of Common Misspellings               My best so far: "abd nabaged"


Ahh, found it again. Don't know where to put this, but sometimes I need to be reminded that even people who act very crossly may have reasonable points that I can agree with.

I can't decide what picture to use
    for my current problem...




This user scored 340 on the Wikipediholic test (revision 752838306).










Simply precious, seen on Slashdot:

>   >   " I'll never be able to prove it, but I know I'm right".
>   There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
It would seem you have backed yourself into a corner here.

Content Disclaimer

Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

  1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
  2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
  3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
  4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
  5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.