• BhikhariInformer (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello folks! Till date, I have created about 45 mainspace articles; mostly films, web series, biographies, places of worship and a historical landmark (my most recent creation). I would love to have the Autopatrolled rights; and it might help prevent the piling up of the NPR backlog, even just by a bit. And I believe I am qualified for this. If I am judged ineligible, I would be happy to work upon myself if my shortcomings are pointed out. Thanks! BhikhariInformer (talk) 11:28, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

@BhikhariInformer Could you explain why you used [1] in Basu Bati. Sohom (talk) 04:24, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

Although it's not equivalent to a major newspaper or journal, I used it cuz it appeared to be a specialised history publication rather than a personal blog. They publish bylined articles, and from what I could gather, the authors appear to be real people with relevant academic backgrounds. And this article contained detailed information about Basu Bati's history. If there are concerns regarding the source's reliability, I'd be grateful if you could point 'em out, as I used it in good faith and would like to improve my source evaluation. BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 05:03, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

{{not done}} @BhikhariInformer (CC @Sohom Datta): it's a brand website. See the very bottom of the page: "Your source for unique home decor and furnishings that blend modern design with traditional Indian craftsmanship. Responsibly sourced from over 11,000 artisans, our products reflect authenticity, sustainability, and fine craftsmanship. Discover the beauty of India with Peepul Tree." I'm sure you used the source in good faith, but this indicates to me that NPP review is still necessary. voorts (talk/contributions) 17:21, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) @Voorts I'm sorry, but I do not really agree with your analysis of that source; Sanjana Ray is in fact an established journalist specialising in lifestyle and probably culture. While PeepulTree appears to be "Your source for unique home decor and furnishings...", I think the website for that branding and whatever is mostly peepultree.world and not livehistoryindia.com; the latter is a website where they publish well-researched articles relating to their niche. In fact, I find the piece to be a well-researched publication by a subject-matter expert, and in livehistoryindia credit, I consider it an excellent, high-quality editorial platform for history enthusiasts, students, cultural explorers, you name it. This is entirely my own opinion and I hope it helps. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:10, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

I'll let another admin review it. voorts (talk/contributions) 19:38, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days ([2]). — MusikBot ^talk 05:00, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

• Mill 1 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Good morning/day/evening my fellow Wikipedians. After 15 years, 200k+ edits and creating a lot of stuff here I think it is time to apply for Autopatrolled permission. I have created about 200 list articles and 150+ other main space articles, mostly biographies. All of them are properly sourced, formatted, and comply with core policies (notability, verifiability, BLP, copyright) even the stubs. Although I love all my children I'm especially proud of next WIR contributions:

(Non-administrator comment) I recommended to @Mill 1 that they apply for autopatroller. They mentioned that new NPP's nominating their soft directs to deletion (which I am also guilty of doing), and it would save everyone time if they were granted autopatroller. They've created over 8000 pages, and only 72 have been deleted.

EaglesFan37 (talk) 22:13, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

Hi, What is the status of my application? It has been a week already and I had to remove speedy deletion tags from new soft redirect pages yet again. I believe this was NPP-er number 5 or 6. Kind Regards,Mill 1 (talk) 17:56, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

@Mill 1: If people are nominating pages you're creating for SD, why should I grant AP? What SD criteria are they using and why do you think they're wrong? Please provide some examples. voorts (talk/contributions) 12:21, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Fair question. It exclusively envolves SD nominations regarding soft redirect pages. I created a lot of them lately (example). Some of the newer NPP-ers are unfamiliair with the soft redirect guidelines resulting in SD nominations. This topic on my Talk page pretty much sums it up. Mill 1 (talk) 12:37, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Some examples + argumentation: 1, 2, 3. Again, these are not 'real' pages which should be the focus of this application.

• OlympiaBuebird (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

79 articles created, zero deleted. Creations look excellent. ~ A412 ^talk! 04:46, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks @A412!

Really appreciate the "creations look excellent". Wish I could say that about my cupcakes when I decide to do some baking.

Saw this nomination in my alerts and was pleasantly surprised. If others feels this user right is a good thing to have, great! If not, fine, too! Whatever helps those editors who do the diligent, and thankless, work behind the scenes works for me.

OlympiaBuebird (talk) 15:27, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

 Done voorts (talk/contributions) 12:27, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

• Alexeyevitch (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hi. I've created 26 pages on the English Wikipedia, mostly relating to New Zealand plants. I also frequently create redirects for the common names of plants. Alexeyevitch^(talk) 05:10, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

• Lanceloth345 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I want to reapply for Autopatroller, to contribute further for creating new good quality articles, as long as I have reflected latest things happend before and i got an big lesson to not comment/accept new pages more via ip user without letting know. I appreciate any decission. Thank you for your attention. Lanceloth345 (talk) 11:37, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([3]). — MusikBot ^talk 11:40, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Courtesy pings for the granting admin Arcticocean and the revoking admin Tamzin; note previous requests in July 2025 (declined) and in March 2026 (accepted). Lanceloth, the evidence presented in your SPI is not looking great for you, and in my opinion indicates that your creations are in need of monitoring from new pages patrol. Even leaving aside the behavioral concerns, I noticed there was a red citation (using a highlighting script) on Stine (singer); following the thread to this RSN discussion which you participated in shows a lot of arguments you made that don't seem to demonstrate understanding of our sourcing guidelines. (Non-administrator comment) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 21:22, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

As per threat at RSN discussion, i understand sourcing just arguing at that topic, that Teksteshqip website was the only website that even Albanian outlets often refers as "unnofficial Albanian singers database". I reeaplied here as i mention before that i have reflected and to edit/vreat in good faith in future. Thank you Lanceloth345 (talk) 06:23, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

• JarJarInks (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I would like to create lists of articles I might want to edit based on Regex and categories. Because of my current computing setup I will need to use JWB, which, unlike AWB, requires being on the check page for all actions, including generating lists. I do not intend to actually make any semi-automated edits until I'm more confident in my Regex skills, and am willing to make another request when that time comes. JarJarInks_{٩(◕_◕)۶}^{Tones essay} 15:25, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

@JarJarInks: you're still under the normal requirements (at least 500 edits or 250 mainspace edits). With your use case, I can justify making an exception, but was wondering how you're getting on with Ponor's userscript instead? In solidarity, —Femke (talk) 🐦 16:54, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

• Maltazarian (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I need to change a couple of thousand redirects real quick due to the French changing the names of their football leagues. Also I'm a page mover and this is just generally useful to have in the toolbox. ⹃Maltazarian ^{ᚾparley${\displaystyle \lor }$investigateᛅ} 00:55, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Also I'd like it given to M-alt-azarian which is a technical alt account I've made for this purpose. ⹃Maltazarian ^{ᚾparley${\displaystyle \lor }$investigateᛅ} 02:02, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

 Done * Pppery * _{in solidarity} 06:28, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user does not appear to have been added to the CheckPage. — MusikBot ^talk 06:30, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

• Fortek67 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hi. I very often help in WP:AI noticeboard with the takedown of LLM-generated articles. I often have to tag many articles with {{AI-generated}} during reports which can take time. Same thing goes during the WP:LLMPROD process, where I have to add {{prod llm}} to articles. My editing history on Wikipedia is also Poland-related articles on rail transport, such as railway stations. These articles often need maintaining such as updating the Train services section when the train timetable changes in Poland, in which it will on 13 June. Fortek67 (talk) 20:09, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

• Streetr4 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

• Edittttor (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello, according to the result from my AE, XC would be removed "until Edittttor has made enough manual non-repetitive edits to earn the right." I have now surpassed that threshold and am requesting reinstatement. I wish to edit articles about US politicians and sometimes those pages are ECP. For transparency, there is an open AE against me, but I believe that innocent until proven guilty should apply, and I have in good faith met the requirements for reinstatement. Based on the AE archives I've looked at, it could take weeks for a resolution there and it seems punitive to extend my punishment if I have met all the requirements. Will be an opportunity for the community to see how I handle reinstatement until the request is resolved. I will make a note there that I have requested reinstatement here. Thanks! Edittttor (talk) 17:14, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had 1 request for extended confirmed declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days ([4]) and has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([5]). — MusikBot ^talk 17:20, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

• Dog Oxide (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I'm currently temporarily approved for NPR rights and I've been participating in the May 2026 backlog drive. I'm finding the review process good so far and I take pride in reducing the backlog. I'm hoping I can get an extension in my NPR rights so I can continue working on reviewing new pages. Thanks, DoO2 02:48, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by HJ Mitchell (expires 00:00, 31 May 2026 (UTC)). — MusikBot ^talk 02:50, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Dog Oxide, could you comment on your review of mHUB? What was your thought process and procedure? _signed, Rosguill ^talk 03:10, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

• Retro music11 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hi, I'm requesting for permission to NPR. I meet the guidelines stated and I intend reducing the backlog by minimizing spam, unsourced and promotional content across new pages. Retro music11 (talk) 16:54, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Also, @Left guide has allowed me to do so. (That's starting a new request with a relevant rationale) Thanks! Retro music11 (talk) 16:56, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days ([6]). — MusikBot ^talk 17:00, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

 Done for 1 month as a trial run after which you may reapply. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 23:00, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user does not appear to have the permission new page reviewer. — MusikBot ^talk 23:00, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

 Not done for the bot post-block _signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:40, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

• PacificDepths (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Requesting indefinite permissions after two rounds of volunteering for the drives. If that is denied, requesting three months. 🌊PacificDepths (talk | contrib) 02:08, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

track record looks good,  Done _signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:42, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

• Pinakpani (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

As a regular editor, I am well acquainted with the guidelines for WP:NPR and I would like to apply for reviewer rights for more useful contribution. Pinakpani (talk) 10:45, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

 Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you are encouraged to reapply. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:44, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

• Sir Banking (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello again, I would like to request an extension of my New Page Reviewer right until August or permanently if they deem it appropriate. I have held this right since May, and my trial period is set to expire on June 8. I believe I have been able to do a good job during this time.

Thank you very much in advance for your time and consideration. Sir Banking (talk) 17:28, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 8 June 2026 (UTC)). — MusikBot ^talk 17:30, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

track record looks good,  Done _signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:55, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

• Obinna Tony (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I have been an active Wikipedia contributor for a while, and thought maybe I could be of help, that's if I meet the requirement to be a new page reviewer. Thank you. Obinna Tony (talk) 21:19, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions and your interest in this permission. On reviewing your recent editing history, it looks like an article you created was deleted at AFD about 2 weeks ago (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abuchi Peter Ugwu), so I don't think you're quite ready for this permission yet.  Not done, consider reapplying after getting more experience with article creation and deletion. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 14:58, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

• Devansh Pilania (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights Devansh Pilania (talk) 08:16, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has 5 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot ^talk 08:20, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

(non-admin closure)  Not done, empty request and not meeting the guidelines. User97104 (t•c•r•l) 00:07, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Did you want this because your drafts keep getting declined, possibly? User97104 (t•c•r•l) 21:54, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

• Tatupiplu (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hi, I'm re-applying for the NPP rights, as it was revoked due to inactivity. I've become active, and spending atleast 6h a day editing. I am now fully confident that I can tackle tasks related to NPP and AfC. Over the last few weeks, I've created 25 articles, edited at least 100 articles, and made over 500 edits in the span of 3–6 months since the start of 2026. I have also participated in AfD and, for the first time, closed an AfD discussion with the help of an admin on the Wikipedia Discord group. I'd like to regain this access, as I will be contributing regularly. Thank you. Tatupiplu’^{✦ talk} 06:03, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days ([7]). — MusikBot ^talk 06:10, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

• Wikipedian12512(alt) (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights Hello. I'd like to request the ability to accept or decline pending changes on both of my accounts (User:Wikipedian12512 and User:Wikipedian12512(alt). I've read the relevant policies (BLP, Vandalism, Copyright Violations, etc.), and think that I could do a reasonable (to start, I'd probably get better over time) job. Thank you! Wikipedian12512 (Talking is fine | contribs) 13:07, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

To be clear, this would be for both my accounts. _{In solidarity}Wikipedian12512 (Talking is fine | contribs) 17:04, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

• Pyrrhic victor (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I often do anti-vandalism and during the course of that task I often come across pending changes, I belive myself capable with aiding in this task, and wish to help out. Pyrrhic victor (what did I do) 16:22, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

 Done TonyBallioni (talk) 03:04, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

• Ari 1600 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello, I'd like to request the pending changes reviewer right. I'd like to use this to make sure no vandalism occurs and to help around. Thank you! Ari 1600 out 🇺🇲🇭🇳 01:56, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

 Not done recommend getting more familiar with content policies. Consider answering requested edits on talk pages as that’s functionally the same thing. Also the apparent EC gaming is concerning. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:09, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

• BhikhariInformer (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello folks! I am requesting the pending changes reviewer rights. I wish to deal with the concerned pages — accepting or refusing pending changes, particularly, to handle the unsourced edits and COI vandalism. Thank you! BhikhariInformer‬ 📮 ^{(Ping me or else I won't see it)} 05:38, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

 Done TonyBallioni (talk) 03:03, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

• Least Action (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I'm requesting this right to fight vandalism in PCR-protected articles. I have read the policies and have a basic understanding. This means I can deal with not-that-simple vandalism such as citation to ads and inserting AI-slop, which might be more common in PCR-protected articles. -- Least Action (talk) 14:08, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has 99 edits in the mainspace. — MusikBot ^talk 14:10, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

 Not done recent user talk activity shows a lack of understanding of how to properly address vandalism TonyBallioni (talk) 03:06, 9 June 2026 (UTC)

• JoBoGamer (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Here to renew my temp perms, I use it on off when I can and idk if I qualify for perm RB yet. JoBo Gamer 11:29, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user was granted temporary rollback rights by Pppery (expires 15:24, 13 May 2026 (UTC)). — MusikBot ^talk 11:30, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

@Pppery: Up to you. Katie^talk 22:22, 17 May 2026 (UTC)

I would describe my action as procedural, and it really should be up to HJ Mitchell who granted the first trial. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 18:25, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

@HJ Mitchell your presence is requested here.

JoBo Gamer 09:58, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

• AZenit3 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

OK, I've reviewed what I was told at my last request. I now have over 200 mainspace edits. I've tried singing up to CVU/A, and now I'm just waiting. Requesting rollback permissions to try AntiVandal, Interceptor, and Huggle. And everything else. Patrolling RecentChanges seems to be the only thing I do nowadays, and I would like rollback to be able to fight vandals better. AZenit3 [Chat?-stuff I've done] 01:47, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days ([8]). — MusikBot ^talk 01:50, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

• TheNerdzilla (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Been patrolling recent changes for some time now with Twinkle, and I would like to try using more advanced tools like Huggle which require this permission. TheNerdzilla (talk) 13:45, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

• Retro music11 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I've been using Twinkle for reporting potential SPs, creating deletion discussions and for notifying new users of unsourced edits. I'm requesting permission to the rollback tool as it'd assist me in reverting vandalism and malicious edits. Retro music11 (talk) 20:47, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

 Done TonyBallioni (talk) 03:32, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you kindly! Retro music11 (talk) 16:28, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user does not appear to have the permission rollback. — MusikBot ^talk 16:30, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

• Chess enjoyer (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hi. I do recent changes patrolling every now and then. Twinkle is wonderful, but I'd like to be able to use tools like Interceptor and Wikishield. Chess enjoyer (talk) 06:19, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

 Done ASUKITE 16:05, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

• BlackJack (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello. I have rollback in my account at Simple Wikipedia. Having tried this evening to counter the activities of ~2026-33439-05 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), I think it would be useful to have rollback here too. I work almost exclusively on cricket articles at present, and it is a subject that frequently attracts vandals. Thanks. Jack (talk) 19:28, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

• AristocrSirr22 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I have been a Pending changes reviewer and would like to have Rollback right to enhance my ability to counter vandalism as well as to use new tools it provides like Interceptor. AristocrSirr22 (talk) 07:31, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

 Not done See #4 above. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:02, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

• Insanityclown1 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Would like to be able to check for signs of loutsocking on articles. I have suspicions that someone has done some very slow loutsocking on the article for Nathan Vasquez for example. Insanityclown1 (talk) 03:34, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

@Insanityclown1: I'm not sure how this perm would help identify LOUTSOCKing? It can compare temporary accounts to one another, which can detect when one person is operating multiple temporary accounts, but it can't connect temporary accounts to registered editors, which is what would show LOUTSOCKing. Can you please clarify? Best, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 04:07, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Perhaps not the correct use of the term loutsocking, but what I was referring to is it appears that the same person is using multiple temporary accounts to insert the same diatribe. Insanityclown1 (talk) 04:41, 18 May 2026 (UTC)

Regarding Nathan Vasquez (lawyer), this permission would not help in cases where edits are this stale/far apart. IP address information is deleted when a temporary account expires 90 days after the edit is made. -- Reconrabbit (talk) 16:35, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

• Telenovelafan215 (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

I am requesting to be a Temporary account IP viewer to deal with vandalism. Recently temporary accounts have been making disruptive edits on the pages Grachi and Esmeralda Pimentel. Knowing if multiple temporary accounts are from the same IP address with be useful when reporting vandalism. I agree to the policy and will only use the addresses for the prevention of vandalism. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 05:56, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

 Done voorts (talk/contributions) 21:59, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

• أوس (t · th · c · del · cross-wiki · SUL · edit counter · pages created (xtools · sigma) · non-automated edits · BLP edits · undos · manual reverts · rollbacks · logs ^{(blocks · rights · moves)} · rfar · spi · cci) (assign permissions)^{(acc · ap · ev · fm · mms · npr · pm · pc · rb · te · taiv)}

Hello, I recently started working on reverting vandalism and monitoring the recent changes page, so I will need this permission. I would like to add that I have sufficient knowledge of this permission as I hold it on Wikidata, and I am the one who wrote and created the policy of this permission on the Arabic Wikipedia (which is currently under voting). I fully agree with the Wikimedia Foundation privacy policy.

Also, for transparency, Just wanted to mention that I currently have a 6-month partial block (page creation & file moves) on Egyptian Wikipedia (arzwiki) due to a false report from an LTA WMF-banned user. There is already an active case with the UCoC committee about this (for more details: meta:Universal Code of Conduct/Coordinating Committee/Cases/2026/Abuse of power, collusion with a Global LTA, and suppression of appeal rights on arzwiki). Since it's a local partial restriction under official review, it won't affect my work here. Thank You. ^_^ -- 🐦‍🔥 Aws ^{💬 Talk} 23:19, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

 Not done virtually all of the edits to en.wiki are from this month (June 2026), that’s not really within the spirit of the guidelines. Would recommend coming back after three months of consistent activity. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:17, 9 June 2026 (UTC)