ARTIKELDIGITAL.COM

Project - 173 User:Useight/Helps - 165 2008 - 159 Wikipedia:Unsuccessful_adminship_candidacies_(Chronological) - 146 Wikipedia Talk:Highly Active Users -...

questions, don't hesitate to ask. Useight (talk) 23:30, 31 March 2009 (UTC) <--- Note the un-customized signature — Useight (talk • contribs) has made few...

last night, but then I went to a Halloween party and then went to sleep. Useight 15:14, 1 November 2007 (UTC) Admin coaching is largely based on asking...

Fools Archives Barnstars Coachees Complaints Fun Goals Guestbook Helps Highly Active Users Let It Go Milestones Most Edited Multiple RFXs Navigation NBA...

case on which we clashed, but it sounds like you have had others as well. Useight (talk) 20:09, 24 August 2008 (UTC) OK, my first dispute that I can remember...

questions is going to be your first impression on the !voters, so answer well. Useight (talk) 22:36, 17 December 2007 (UTC) Your answers were pretty good, especially...

criteria. If you meet the items on that list, you'll have a chance at RFA. Useight (talk) 02:08, 3 May 2008 (UTC) Thanks for the link to your RFA standards...

be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 02:56, 3...

Raghith Maximz2005 Thehelpfulone Ianlopez1115 Chubbennaitor Habaneroman! Useight Cyclonenim Wyatt915 Editor510 Happysunshine Zebec Maniadis Genius101 Spittlespat...

Raghith Maximz2005 Thehelpfulone Ianlopez1115 Chubbennaitor Habaneroman! Useight Cyclonenim Wyatt915 Editor510 Happysunshine Zebec Maniadis Genius101 Spittlespat...

2006 (UTC) As you say, confrontation of a voter in a challenging matter is highly offensive. Sometimes these border on a personal attack when challenging...

the inefficiency? Whether there is inappopriate focus is highly...let me restate that...HIGHLY controversial. It is very unlikely that any consensus would...

Sep 2004 (UTC) VV 23:02, 22 Sep 2004 (UTC) For the reasons noted above: Highly valuable for tracking individual nominations, especially for the future...

ϢereSpielChequers, SoWhy, Dank, Keegan, Juliancolton, Tiptoety, Mazca, Protonk, Useight and others all had some very nice things to say. The last couple days did...

be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 17:32, 3...

think of a few recent attempts where the candidate was neither highly qualified nor highly unqualified. One is me, one is Werdna648. Another is Badlydrawnjeff...

equates all edits as equal, when in reality the value of a given edit is highly subjective and impossible to measure in any objective way. The root issue...

A multiple key system is a more effective way of limiting that than any highly trusted user setup and should be used for anything which is troublesome...

it really takes away from the purpose of having an RFA page. Plus, it's highly distracting. --216.191.200.1 21:45, 6 October 2005 (UTC) Since when have...

- how do we compare an admin who makes 995 uncontroversial blocks and 5 highly controversial ones with someone who makes 50 blocks? (BTW, I show up as...

original three questions, I'd imagine answering these questions would be highly recommended). I'm not expecting admin candidates to be perfect. There are...

five of your commas and I'm going to use them as apostrophes! Bwahaha! Useight (talk) 04:27, 2 May 2008 (UTC) I found a whole bunch of spares separating...

21 December 2006 (UTC) Phyiscq is quite right, though the question seems highly problematic all optional questions are answered at the discretion of the...

just saying that a policy of 80% is not something that is agreed on by a highly significant number of those voting. If I were going to vote, I would actually...

there is no policy to remove him as an admin. If it should fail (which is highly unlikley in the first place) then he can request to be de-admined, can't...

trustworty user gkhan 03:03, 26 September 2005 (UTC) What if you have a highly trusted user who leaves "minor" as an edit summary? Would you trust that...

can use that, too. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me. Useight (talk) 17:58, 3 June 2008 (UTC) It appears the globe stand was from a copyrighted...

used in the FAC process, where it has proved highly effective. This would be optional, of course, but highly recommended. It would ne easy to implement...

Vandal-fighting is a necessary activity, and one to which adminship is highly relevant (rollback and block). Why does it matter whether someone who wants...

reaction he'll probably lose interest. --W.marsh 16:41, 25 March 2006 (UTC) I highly encourage users to focus on the candidates, and on the vote on hand. Persons...

for lurking at this page. No barbeque, huh? Well, I have to work today. Useight (talk) 18:51, 4 July 2008 (UTC) datestamp for bot 21:41, 4 July 2008 (UTC)...

oddball case who 28 days later manages to pass an RfA - so it might be a highly suggested policy but not a strict "your rfa will be removed if you don't"...

Johnleemk | Talk 17:48, 23 April 2006 (UTC) Did Brion say that? I'd be highly interested in seeing where he said that. JoshuaZ 17:52, 23 April 2006 (UTC)...

really. Wait two months or so. Andre (talk) 14:34, 13 September 2005 (UTC) I highly recommend that this RfA be removed early. It's an overwhleming rejection...

them as an admin. I am advocating that admins should be intervening on highly contentious issues, RfC, RfPP, and 3RR are lists of people begging for that...

knowledgeable, and civil than it is to chalk up X number of GAs, FAs, or DYKs. Useight (talk) 20:45, 23 January 2009 (UTC) yea, overall, just be yourself, be...

Raghith Maximz2005 Thehelpfulone Ianlopez1115 Chubbennaitor Habaneroman! Useight Cyclonenim Wyatt915 Editor510 Happysunshine Zebec Maniadis Genius101 Spittlespat...

John Reid 22:48, 14 April 2006 (UTC) General agreement, but I would be highly annoyed to be missing oh say the last month of a user's edits then I'll...

is highly unlikely that you will pass a RfA with only 102 edits; check out some of the informal standards by some Wikipedians. As such, I highly recommend...

of experience since our paths last crossed, so we'll see how this goes. Useight (talk) 16:32, 25 June 2008 (UTC) Alright, I created a subpage at User:Red...

could have gone unnoticed for this long. Although I believe that it is highly unlikely that it would not be noticed until the RfA's deadline, we all need...

will be no consensus to grant adminship." to be defined as "if it is highly, highly unlikely that the nominee will recieve even a majority" or something...

the description of policy that was composed by a handful of admittedly highly respected Wikipedians but nonetheless a handful. I think this smacks of...

harm in having so many active at the same time. Now, if there were sixteen highly contentious nominations up at once, we might consider a moratorium just...

the current class of admins are perceived by at least some users to be highly arrogant. Whether this is true or not, I believe the perception exists....

"revealuser" decision-making privilege would be limited to a limited number of highly trusted users (not admins, perhaps bureaucrats) and its usage would be logged...

maturity level of a responsible adult (18+) - evaluation of maturity is highly critical, but subjective, and I believe that minors who are admins should...

that only fully-completed nominations can be listed. Therefore, it is highly unlikely that a nominator would list a nomination for the nominee. My change...

Raghith Maximz2005 Thehelpfulone Ianlopez1115 Chubbennaitor Habaneroman! Useight Cyclonenim Wyatt915 Editor510 Happysunshine Zebec Maniadis Genius101 Spittlespat...

be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 04:43, 4...

be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 17:13, 3...

be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 05:57, 3...

be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 17:52, 3...

User:TenPoundHammer#Why I'm not an admin yet and Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Useight_3#Oppose. During this time, I still think you should continue to do XfD's...

Useight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) I joined Wikipedia on December 2, 2006 (before that I only used...

Highway Editor Stan Shebs Pictures JohnnyReb1977 Georgia Editor N2e Darkhelmet322 RHaworth7 Brookie Admin Useight Admin Admin     Fnlaysont Aircraft      ...

JohnnyReb1977 Georgia Editor N2e Darkhelmet322 RHaworth7 Brookie Admin Useight Admin Admin Etineskid   Fnlaysont Aircraft   DragonflySixtySeven Admin...

note, the first three supports were cast before the RFA was transcluded. Useight (talk) 23:50, 26 September 2099 (UTC) While I have not personally interacted...

in the upper 70 °F (21 °C)s, and now we've fallen down to the forties. Highly unpredictable here. —La Pianista (T•C) 07:23, 17 January 2009 (UTC) Whoops...

be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 05:56, 3...

only get one in this record-setting RFA and I wanted to make it count. Useight (talk) 03:01, 3 December 2099 (UTC) Just a general note but WP:300 was...

that are noted as "Re-RFA" in particular. Useight (talk) 03:11, 5 May 2019 (UTC) Hi Enigmaman! As Useight stated above, Wikipedia:List of resysopped...

program by Useight! Kudos! This editor is a Journeyman Editor and is entitled to display this Service Badge. This editor is listed at Highly Active Users...

consensus. Just thought I'd drop in and wish you better luck next time. Useight (talk) 22:54, 26 March 2008 (UTC) I too was saddened by your RFA. IMHO...

Paxse 134 291 157 6 Candlewicke 250 400 150 7 Juliancolton 355 491 136 8 Useight 116 250 134 9 the_ed17 40 148 108 10 X! 105 210 105 LF = Last Week's score...

User LF TF D 1 Durova 1348 1528 180 2 Shoemaker's Holiday 420 566 146 3 Useight 420 549 129 4 Matthewedwards 504 625 121 5 ThinkBlue 142 248 106 6 Gary...

criteria. Based on current consensus, I'd recommend withdrawing per WP:SNOW. Useight 22:18, 14 September 2007 (UTC) Oppose. Essentially an inactive, single-purpose...

Climie.ca (30) Matthewedwards (22) J Milburn (16) Rlevse (15) Paxse (14) Useight (12) Theleftorium (10) All scores are accurate as of the end of Round 1...

King 126 213 87 2 Bedford 125 200 75 3 Shoemaker's Holiday 611 683 72 4 Useight 350 420 70 5 Scorpion0422 340 409 69 LF = Last Week's score, TF = This...

be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 02:41, 3...

user was gone from the list and already blocked. Keep up the good work. Useight's Public Sock (talk) 20:09, 18 January 2013 (UTC) Thanks. The wonder of...

WP:RD/C link doesn't link because you can't link to the page you're on. Useight (talk) 00:30, 30 January 2008 (UTC) Good question. When I remove e-mail...

the page is written in a 100% credible, truthful, and factual manner. I highly recommend keeping this page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.193...

(checkuser) ToBeFree (checkuser, ArbCom) UninvitedCompany (bureaucrat) Useight (bureaucrat) Versageek (checkuser) WereSpielChequers (bureaucrat) Worm...

started at 04:10, 12 December 2008 1974 New Orleans Saints season by User:Useight started at 04:03, 12 December 2008 Perpetuelle by User:Tigertrader started...

Vilenski":1,"MWOAP":1,"Maxim":1,"Primefac":1,"UninvitedCompany":1,"Useight":1,"Useight's Public Sock":1,"Xaosflux":1,"Xeno":1,"Xenocidic":1},"sysop":{"'zin...

(UTC) Hey, no problem. I'm always glad to help in any capacity I can. Useight 06:43, 1 September 2007 (UTC) Yeah, I know, this guy's just being very...

Wikipedia:USEFUL|Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions Wikipedia:USEIGHT|Wikipedia talk:List of administrators/Inactive Wikipedia:USELESS|Wikipedia:Arguments...