User:Winhunter

Winhunter (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) joined Wikipedia in 12 April, 2005 and became an administrator on 4 September, 2006.

Requests for adminship and bureaucratship update
No current discussions. Recent RfAs, recent RfBs: (successful, unsuccessful)


Articles I...

Created

Expanded significantly

My other accounts

My bookmarks

Dashboard

User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users User:Xenocidic/dashboard/users

Immediate requests Entries
Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
Wikipedians looking for help 0
...from administrators 1
Requests for unblock 57
Wikipedia semi-protected edit requests 24
Wikipedia extended-confirmed-protected edit requests 57
Wikipedia template-protected edit requests 23
Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 7
Wikipedia conflict of interest edit requests 564
Requested RD1 redactions 3
Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
Candidates for speedy deletion 49
Open sockpuppet investigations 85
Click here to locate other admin backlogs

Purge the cache of this page

Administrative backlog

Reports


User-reported

Candidates for speedy deletion Entries
Attack pages 0
Copyright violations 0
Hoaxes 0
Vandalism 0
User requested 8
Empty articles 0
Nonsense pages 0
Spam pages 8
LLM pages 7
Importance or significance not asserted 7
Possibly contested candidates 17
Other candidates 22
The following articles and files have been proposed for deletion for around 7 days:
Deletion backlog

Wikipedia files with unknown source – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files missing permission – No backlog currently
Wikipedia files with no non-free use rationale – No backlog currently
Disputed non-free Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Orphaned non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently
Replaceable non-free use Wikipedia files – No backlog currently

Wikipedia files with a different name on Wikimedia Commons – 3 items

Wikipedia files with the same name on Wikimedia Commons – 58 items

Non-free files with orphaned versions more than 7 days old needing human review – 1 item

Requested RD1 redactions – 3 items

Proposed deletion – No backlog currently
Usernames for administrator attention


User-reported

Requests for page protection


Current requests for increase in protection level

Request addition of protection to a page, or increasing the current protection level
Place requests for protection increases at the BOTTOM of this section. If you cannot find your request, check the archive of requests or the page history. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2026%E2%80%9327_AFC_Challenge_League&diff=prev&oldid=1357875577 (vandalism despite latest sources presented) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Эльдар Шукоров (talkcontribs) 11:51, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

So, provide your source. I cannot see any source in your edit. KyleRGiggs (talk) 18:31, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
You now provided a source which is "https://www.flashscore.com/football/asia/afc-challenge-league/#/IJxolPTg/draw/", which is a betting-related website. We need a reliable source, which is the best to be AFC official website. When AFC took the draw? I don't know. As a result, I will once more revert that edit. If you insist to accuse this as a vandalism, I will report for a request block as you are violating both WP:RS and WP:AGF. KyleRGiggs (talk) 18:36, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

+1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2026%E2%80%9327_AFC_Challenge_League#Preliminary_stage

https://www.flashscore.com/football/asia/afc-challenge-league/fixtures/ source (please revert any further fixture change if unsourced) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Эльдар Шукоров (talkcontribs) 19:40, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Um, Kyle just pointed out that that domain is a gambling site ... hardly a reliable source. And neither do we use our own articles as sources. Daniel Case (talk) 22:54, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
It is not actually a gambling site, but at least it is not an official source. We need the sources provided by Asian Football Confederation, either official website or any official social media including YouTube. His source is neither one. KyleRGiggs (talk) 23:23, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Temporary full protection: Content Dispute/Edit Warring. 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 08:27, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Semi-protection:

Reason: Persistant disruption by various IP accounts for POV pushing in a infobox image caption name of a mountain (Girnar). Per MOS:SPECIFICLINK and WP:COMMONNAME the caption should be the direct article name of the place i.e. Girnar itself by its article title name, which was there until various IP accounts emerge after some time period and try to push their religious name in the title of this place. For your context, this place also has ancient Ashoka's Rock Edicts, ancient Uperkot fort and Ropeway for tourism too as per the page. But these IPs want to change the title name as per their Pov. Also if you look at their contributions, you'll find the same cohort of pages being edited per their Pov (including using of Chatgpt generated links and later removing the part from the url, using non-RS sub-standard sources and changing info for Pov pushing without any RS source etc.) So requesting Semi-protection for this page. ACMehta (talk) 09:42, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Reason: Adding unreferenced content, transfer rumors, etc. Zdremon (talk) 11:54, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Reason: Recurring vandalism. Borgenland (talk) 12:10, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. I know I requested this yesterday and it got rejected because his death was confirmed but IP vandalism is still happening and the speculation I mentioned yesterday wasn’t about him dying, it was about IPs continuously adding speculative material about his place of death mainly. Some more IPs have continued to do so since the request was declined yesterday. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 13:15, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:29, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
    Further to comment, there are IPs still adding unsourced material or wrong information with numerous reverts (speculative death place, incorrect middle name, still reverting sourced material, etc.) Article is also listed on main page so might be prone to further vandalism TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 15:59, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. ~ŤheŴubṂachine-840✒️ 16:37, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Semi-protection: BLP policy violations. Tbhotch (CC BY-SA 4.0) 16:49, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pending changes also a possibility, but I'm leaning toward my actual request. Pattern of specific vandalism seen in this article has been going on at least a couple of months now (and some temporary accounts have been indefinitely blocked as a result of it), but the frequency of the vandalism ... I don't know ... doesn't seem to be high, but this spurt today is part of an ongoing problem. MPFitz1968 (talk) 23:42, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Reason: Unconfirmed users (likely the same person) keeps reverting edits even though it is completely sourced properly. The edits this user(s) are creating are incorrect and myself and other users keep reverting there edits back almost daily. I've already reached out on there talk page and warned them to stop. This person or persons also bossed people on the talk page. Here is what they said: Who is replacing Shannon, Please add the former members section on the list of Toto members, Can you do it right now?, Please put Keith as a tour member right now today. The user(s) in offense are non-confirmed users but there usernames are ~2026-19714-70 and ~2026-33527-46. I'm humbly asking to increase the protection for this page to a semi-protected page to avoid this user or users for just creating temporary accounts and messing up this page daily. Thanks! Synth Legend (talk) 02:10, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection: Arbitration enforcement. tony 02:35, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent vandalism by TAs. Bikram96 (talk) 06:18, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Reason: Since the page's last protection ended in May 2025, most IP edits have been non-constructive. However, I don't believe the disruption is high enough for indefinite semi-protection. Maybe pending changes could work instead? OwenCobalt (talk) 07:20, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

@OwenCobalt I think indef WP:PCP is the better option. The article has been a target since Adam met Eve, but the level of disruption doesn't warrant a full-blown IP/TA block. Giovanni Potage (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – There has been an increase in disruptive editing on this article since her death. Some IP editors and accounts have changed the wording to suggest she is still alive, and these edits have needed repeated reversion. ItsShandog (talk) 07:35, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Long history of vandalism. Entranced98 (talk) 08:46, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Reason: Apparently, some random user "somehow" vandalised this page. It's to do with Henry's parents that are "abusive." So can you please undo this edit and protect the page, please? I think it's to do with disruptive editing. Thank you! EucalyGuard (talk) 10:03, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

(Non-administrator comment) Reverted, user warned. Entranced98 (talk) 12:38, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Reason: Please protect this page from vandalism by anonymous authors. He (or they) repeatedly declare the outcome of the war as a "Kazakh victory," - [1] adding a footnote below this statement citing Kazakh sources. However, the authors of these books do not cite neutral and authoritative sources when writing about the ultimate Kazakh victory in these wars. Thus, the opinions of exclusively Kazakh historians do not meet the requirements of a neutral point of view. The anonymous authors also add that the Volga Kalmyks and Khoshuts of the Kukunor Khanate allegedly fought on the side of the Dzungars. However, the article makes no direct claims to this effect (and contains no neutral sources to support this). TheEasyNick (talk) 10:19, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Note: While articles must comply with NPOV, we do not require sources to be neutral. - The Bushranger One ping only 19:52, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Toketaatalk 10:49, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Comment Looks like the same multiple IP user that attacked this page last night until the last warning kept him away: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:~2026-33595-57&diff=prev&oldid=1358181044 -- Bringingthewood (talk) 23:18, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Moderately high amount of recent vandalism (judging solely by ClueBot reverts), though understandable given his recent feature film debut. The film has a month's protection; maybe a similar length here? GSK 13:39, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

  • Automated comment: A request for protection/unprotection for one or more pages in this request was recently made, and was denied at some point within the last 8 days.—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online 13:40, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Spamming returned within a day of a previous protection expiring. Entranced98 (talk) 13:46, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. This page Always Change by Woxic is IP he was banned p But he always change the page~2026-33741-99 (talk) 13:50, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent addition of unsourced birthdate to BLP. Waxworker (talk) 13:58, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing over the past few months. Annh07 (talk) 18:17, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent addition of unsourced or poorly sourced content – This page has been dogged for quite a while by constant changes to layout, population numbers, coats of arms, etc. by both IP/anon and registered users. User:Pbritti and I have kept watch, but we have been reverting a lot for quite some time; of the last 500 edits, 216 were either reverted or reversion actions themselves. ThaesOfereode (talk) 18:30, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Most of the edits over the last year seem to have been WP:CT/CASTE violations by non-autoconfirmed TAs. Cadddr (talk) 19:54, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent IP vandalism from 29 May onward. Clarityfiend (talk) 23:08, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – User continually trying to add content without discussing on talk. Hatman31 (he/him · talk · contribs) 00:45, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent dumping of WP:LLM junk. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 02:38, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ConnerTT (talk) 03:45, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Sushidude21! (talk) 04:08, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Reason: Repeated addition of unsourced content by anonymous users. Requesting temporary semi-protection. Cyberlink420 (talk) 04:31, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: BLP policy violations – Persistent BLP vioaltions by IPs and new editors. The disputed wording should be discussed in talk page before being updated. Suggesting 4 weeks. - The9Man Talk 05:22, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing. Chyx1095 (🗣️📜) 07:12, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Reason: Continuous problems with lots of small vandalic-like (even if good faith) edits, like those by ~2026-33592-49. At least semi-protection is needed; it was suggested before, but denied, though it must be done now, as the website is controversial and new users will come to make unthoughtful edits. From Alba, Celtoi, (talk) 07:42, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Reason: High level of IP vandalism. Эльдар Шукоров (talk) 11:44, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Reason: IP vandalism Beshogur (talk) 11:49, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – High visibility, almost no constructive edits from new accounts or TA's. Most letter articles are indef protected, this one should be too. Toketaatalk 12:27, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Similarly to O, pending changes was added a year and a half ago and the amount of vandalism barely changed, high visibility, indef protect this just like the majority of letter articles. Toketaatalk 12:32, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Toketaatalk 12:36, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – sockpuppetry AND vandalism. Toketaatalk 12:44, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – timelash. Toketaatalk 12:52, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – timelash, no new editors should be editing this anyways. Toketaatalk 12:53, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. Toketaatalk 13:01, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Demographics. Toketaatalk 13:17, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Also Full move protection. Toketaatalk 13:29, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Demographics. Toketaatalk 13:21, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Demographics. Toketaatalk 13:23, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Demographics. Toketaatalk 13:24, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Indefinite extended confirmed protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – Demographics. Toketaatalk 13:26, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Also Full move protection. Toketaatalk 13:30, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Pretty much all vandalism since protection expired. Toketaatalk 13:36, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Temporary pending changes: Persistent vandalism – Reinstate pending changes that expired last November. High visibility page but there are some constructive TA edits so just do pending changes. Toketaatalk 15:08, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. Toketaatalk 15:51, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Nothing but reverts for months. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 16:01, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry – TAs evading active blocks to edit war an incorrect date into the article. Belbury (talk) 16:33, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent disruptive editing – Persistent disruptive editing from IP editor(s). Bgsu98 (Talk) 16:44, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Indefinite semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Persistent, low-grade, ongoing vandalism. Some anon - or group of anons or a troll farm...whatever - repeatedly changes the (referenced!) birth-year to an (UNreferenced!!) exact date. The date is not supported by *ANY* reliable sources. Please protect this article from any editing by anons. If you look at the edit history of this article you will see that this vandalism/IDONTHEARTHAT behavior is ongoing, happening every so often, every few weeks or couple of months etc. I am TIRED of having to fix this error. Please make it stop. Though this editing behavior seems to be happening mostly on this article it also happens a couple times a year on associated Washington family articles such as Augustine Washington & Mary Ball Washington. Shearonink (talk) 16:54, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. I do see that it's been going on for a while, but it doesn't seem to be happening all that often. I've started a discussion on the talkpage to see if they can come up with an actual source. SarekOfVulcan (talk) 17:34, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
Ok, got it, will go there to discuss but there are no reliable sources for an exact date. All we have is the year, that's it and some sources even just say "born about 1602". The exact date is an internet myth, akin to the supposed ancestry of Mary Ball Washington that was published as a joke but then gets repeated incrementally on the internet ad nauseum. - Shearonink (talk) 18:36, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent vandalism. ~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 17:23, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Temporary semi-protection: Persistent vandalism – Temporary IDs changing / removing sourced financial figures [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10]. -. Fylindfotberserk (talk) 18:49, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Reason: Recent surge in attempts to vandalize page. Shahinshah121 (talk) 18:59, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Reason: Persistent vandalism from a blocked serbian nationalist for pov pushing ~2026-33889-82 (talk) 19:21, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Reason: I am requesting page protection due to repeated editing disputes in the lead-up to the upcoming municipal election. Several recent edits have introduced contentious and potentially defamatory material about Mayor Harvie that appears to rely on limited local media coverage and may not satisfy Wikipedia's standards for neutrality, due weight, and verifiability.

Multiple editors have repeatedly restored this content despite ongoing concerns regarding sourcing, balance, and compliance with Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy. This has resulted in a cycle of repeated reversion and dispute over the article's content.

Given the heightened political interest surrounding the upcoming election, temporary page protection may help prevent further disruption and allow editors to discuss disputed content through established Wikipedia processes before making additional substantive changes to the article. ~2026-33747-97 (talk) 19:24, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Semi-protection: Persistent sockpuppetry. 45dogs (they/them) (talk page) (contributions) 19:42, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Current requests for reduction in protection level

Request removal of protection from a page, or reducing the current protection level

seraphimblade, you protected this page at a time when the subject of this article was in the process of no longer holding a prominent role in life. That protection was reasonable at the moment since unverified or poorly verified edits went into that article within short periods of time. However, I believe that protection isn't necessary anymore because that was 10 years ago. Furthermore, the last edit to that page happened nearly a couple years ago, which may imply that the possibility of disruptive edits to that page is low. What do you think?~2026-33236-94 (talk) 22:33, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

This is not the user's talk page, which you should have posted this request on. - The Bushranger One ping only 02:57, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
Pinging protecting admin, @Seraphimblade. Giovanni Potage (talk) 13:18, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
I don't see any indication here of what edits the editor asking for unprotection here wants to make or what sources support them. I think I would like to know that before agreeing to removing the protection when the protection was for a BLP problem. Seraphimblade Talk to me 17:08, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
@Seraphimblade From the looks of it, protection was mainly the result of a skirmish between an anon and an experienced editor over mentioning Shahinian's medical license being revoked. At the time (and this still might be the case), no reputable sources bothered to write about that. Giovanni Potage (talk) 04:20, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
I found this article, but not sure if it meets the WP:RS requirements necessary to warrant coverage on a BLP article. Giovanni Potage (talk) 04:25, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
@Giovanni Potage: That's from the Metropolitan News-Enterprise, which has come up on RSN a couple of times and appears to be considered reliable. - The Bushranger One ping only 04:56, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
Thanks for answering! MNE being a reputable source doesn't surprise me since they have an editorial team, but I wanted to be cautious. Giovanni Potage (talk) 04:59, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
If there's now good source material available, I don't have a problem with trying unprotection for a bit. Though I'll certainly be putting it back if BLP violations start up again. Seraphimblade Talk to me 16:50, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Unprotection: Has both indef pending changes and indef semi, pending changes is unnecessary. Toketaatalk 17:24, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Both the pending changes and semi-protection were recently placed by the same admin who is active. Was there an attempt made to discuss this article's protection with that admin before coming here? Left guide (talk) 18:57, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Unprotection: Gets around 1 edit a year, I don't think this sockpuppeteer is active anymore. Toketaatalk 17:58, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Unprotection: 2009's article just got unprotected, this one should also be unprotected. Toketaatalk 18:00, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

According to the logs, the page has been moved and the relevant protection seems to be visible here, placed by Ericorbit who last edited in 2022 and was last an admin in 2017. Left guide (talk) 18:50, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Unprotection: see above. Toketaatalk 18:01, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

According to the logs, the page has been moved and the relevant protection seems to be visible here, placed by Ericorbit who last edited in 2022 and was last an admin in 2017. Left guide (talk) 18:47, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Current requests for edits to a protected page

Request a specific edit be made to a protected page


Handled requests

A historical archive of previous protection requests can be found at Wikipedia:Requests for page protection/Archive.

Protected edit requests

10 protected edit requests
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Template:Edit filter warning (request) 2026-05-19 17:03 Fully protected (log) Modified by MusikAnimal on 2019-02-25: "High-risk template or module; used in system message"
Template:Wikipedia's sister projects (request) 2026-06-01 21:20 Cascade-protected from Wikipedia:Cascade-protected items/Main Page/5 (log) Protected by Mifter on 2017-03-25: "Considering the main page was unprotected by a compromised sysop semi recently, perhaps transcluding it to a cascade protected page will provide a small increase in protection"
MediaWiki:Searchmenu-exists (request) 2026-06-04 20:01 MediaWiki page (log)
MediaWiki:Searchmenu-new (request) 2026-06-04 20:01 MediaWiki page (log)
MediaWiki:Searchmenu-new-external (request) 2026-06-04 20:01 MediaWiki page (log)
MediaWiki:Searchmenu-new-nocreate (request) 2026-06-04 20:01 MediaWiki page (log)
Template:Navbar (request) 2026-06-07 15:00 Fully protected (log) Modified by Xaosflux on 2015-12-23: "used in the mediawiki interface ex: MediaWiki:Watchlist-details"
Main Page (request) 2026-06-08 10:19 Fully protected with cascading (log) Modified by KrakatoaKatie on 2016-11-16: "restore"
Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia/Little Adventures of Bruno (request) 2026-06-08 13:02 Fully protected (log) Protected by ReaderofthePack on 2014-11-22: "hoax page"
Wikipedia:List of hoaxes on Wikipedia/Rudolph's Greatest Adventures (request) 2026-06-08 13:03 Fully protected (log) Protected by ReaderofthePack on 2015-07-12: "archived hoax page"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 13:04, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
28 template-protected edit requests
Page Tagged since Protection level Last protection log entry
Module:JSONutil (request) 2026-01-28 19:50 Template-protected (log) Protected by Xaosflux on 2023-06-26: "shouldn't exist without good reason, some portable modules are checking this"
Module:Location map (request) 2026-03-22 12:25 Template-protected (log) Protected by HJ Mitchell on 2014-03-11: "High-risk Lua module: requested at RfPP"
Template:Huggle/warn-1 (request) 2026-04-24 02:04 Template-protected (log) Modified by Oshwah on 2018-09-09: "High risk template"
Template:Infobox language (request) 2026-04-25 05:26 Template-protected (log) Modified by MusikAnimal on 2021-08-16: "Highly visible template: transclusion count now over 9,000; most recent editors are still able to edit"
Template:Blocked proxy (request) 2026-05-04 17:21 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Colocationwebhost (request) 2026-05-04 17:21 Template-protected (log) Modified by Fuhghettaboutit on 2013-11-02: "Enable access by template editors"
Template:Webhostblock (request) 2026-05-04 17:21 Template-protected (log) Modified by Callanecc on 2014-01-04: "Highly visible template: Also used in the interface as a block reason, Allowing template editors."
Template:Uw-softerblock (request) 2026-05-17 04:43 Template-protected (log) Modified by Callanecc on 2014-01-04: "Highly visible template: Also used in the interface as a block reason"
Template:Uw-ublock (request) 2026-05-17 04:43 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-12-22: "Highly visible template"
Template:U.S. House of Representatives abbreviation (request) 2026-05-17 12:08 Template-protected (log) From Template:Ushr: Modified by WOSlinker on 2013-10-20: "allow template editors to modify"
Template:Non-free album cover (request) 2026-05-20 22:56 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Template:Translated page (request) 2026-05-28 16:58 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mr. Stradivarius on 2015-05-18: "Highly visible template: allow template editors"
Template:Taxonomy/Amphiesmenoptera (request) 2026-05-28 17:26 Template-protected (log) Modified by Primefac on 2018-02-23: "high-risk template with 4000+ transclusions"
Template:Taxonomy/Dicondylia (request) 2026-05-28 18:28 Template-protected (log) Modified by Renamed user mou89p43twvqcvm8ut9w3 on 2016-11-08: "Highly visible template"
Template:Taxonomy/Cyclorrhapha (request) 2026-05-28 20:55 Template-protected (log) Modified by Favonian on 2023-08-14: "High-risk template or module: requested at WP:RFPP"
Template:Rquote (request) 2026-05-29 08:06 Template-protected (log) From Template:Reduced pull quote: Modified by Ymblanter on 2014-05-09: "RFPP request by a temlate editor"
Template:Infobox handball club (request) 2026-05-29 10:16 Template-protected (log) Modified by MelanieN on 2019-02-16: "Highly visible template"
Module:Sidebar/styles.css (request) 2026-05-29 12:18 Template-protected (log) Protected by MusikBot II on 2021-01-26: "High-risk template or module (more info)"
Template:Contentious topics/editnotice (request) 2026-06-03 03:09 Template-protected (log) Protected by Dreamy Jazz on 2023-01-15: "Highly visible template"
Template:Gs/editnotice (request) 2026-06-03 03:09 Template-protected (log) Protected by Daniel Quinlan on 2023-09-30: "Highly visible template"
Template:Contains special characters (request) 2026-06-05 08:48 Template-protected (log) Protected by Primefac on 2020-06-23: "Highly visible template"
Template:Infobox station (request) 2026-06-05 20:38 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-10-18: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Module:Plain text (request) 2026-06-06 21:07 Template-protected (log) Protected by Oshwah on 2018-05-07: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:Tag (request) 2026-06-07 02:59 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mark Arsten on 2013-11-19: "Allowing Protected Template editors"
Module:Documentation (request) 2026-06-08 04:28 Template-protected (log) Protected by Mr. Stradivarius on 2014-01-31: "High-risk Lua module"
Module:Documentation/config (request) 2026-06-08 04:28 Template-protected (log) Protected by Mr. Stradivarius on 2014-01-31: "High-risk Lua module"
Template:Extended confirmed restriction (request) 2026-06-08 12:23 Not protected (log)
Template:Period start (request) 2026-06-08 15:02 Template-protected (log) Modified by Mr. Stradivarius on 2014-06-11: "Highly visible template: allow template editors"
Updated as needed. Last updated: 15:05, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

WP:PERM

Requests for autopatrolled

Autopatrolled

Hello folks! Till date, I have created about 45 mainspace articles; mostly films, web series, biographies, places of worship and a historical landmark (my most recent creation). I would love to have the Autopatrolled rights; and it might help prevent the piling up of the NPR backlog, even just by a bit. And I believe I am qualified for this. If I am judged ineligible, I would be happy to work upon myself if my shortcomings are pointed out. Thanks! BhikhariInformer (talk) 11:28, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

@BhikhariInformer Could you explain why you used [11] in Basu Bati. Sohom (talk) 04:24, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
Although it's not equivalent to a major newspaper or journal, I used it cuz it appeared to be a specialised history publication rather than a personal blog. They publish bylined articles, and from what I could gather, the authors appear to be real people with relevant academic backgrounds. And this article contained detailed information about Basu Bati's history. If there are concerns regarding the source's reliability, I'd be grateful if you could point 'em out, as I used it in good faith and would like to improve my source evaluation. BhikhariInformer 📮 (Ping me or else I won't see it) 05:03, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
{{not done}} @BhikhariInformer (CC @Sohom Datta): it's a brand website. See the very bottom of the page: "Your source for unique home decor and furnishings that blend modern design with traditional Indian craftsmanship. Responsibly sourced from over 11,000 artisans, our products reflect authenticity, sustainability, and fine craftsmanship. Discover the beauty of India with Peepul Tree." I'm sure you used the source in good faith, but this indicates to me that NPP review is still necessary. voorts (talk/contributions) 17:21, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) @Voorts I'm sorry, but I do not really agree with your analysis of that source; Sanjana Ray is in fact an established journalist specialising in lifestyle and probably culture. While PeepulTree appears to be "Your source for unique home decor and furnishings...", I think the website for that branding and whatever is mostly peepultree.world and not livehistoryindia.com; the latter is a website where they publish well-researched articles relating to their niche. In fact, I find the piece to be a well-researched publication by a subject-matter expert, and in livehistoryindia credit, I consider it an excellent, high-quality editorial platform for history enthusiasts, students, cultural explorers, you name it. This is entirely my own opinion and I hope it helps. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 19:10, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
I'll let another admin review it. voorts (talk/contributions) 19:38, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for autopatrolled declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days ([12]). MusikBot talk 05:00, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Good morning/day/evening my fellow Wikipedians. After 15 years, 200k+ edits and creating a lot of stuff here I think it is time to apply for Autopatrolled permission. I have created about 200 list articles and 150+ other main space articles, mostly biographies. All of them are properly sourced, formatted, and comply with core policies (notability, verifiability, BLP, copyright) even the stubs. Although I love all my children I'm especially proud of next WIR contributions:

Currently I am focussing on Wikispecies-related topics so the last 350+ 'pages' are soft redirects to Wikisecies. As you can see in the logs there haven't been any major issues. Thank you for your time. Kind regards, Mill 1 (talk) 20:17, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
(Non-administrator comment) I recommended to @Mill 1 that they apply for autopatroller. They mentioned that new NPP's nominating their soft directs to deletion (which I am also guilty of doing), and it would save everyone time if they were granted autopatroller. They've created over 8000 pages, and only 72 have been deleted.
EaglesFan37 (talk) 22:13, 28 May 2026 (UTC)
Hi, What is the status of my application? It has been a week already and I had to remove speedy deletion tags from new soft redirect pages yet again. I believe this was NPP-er number 5 or 6. Kind Regards,Mill 1 (talk) 17:56, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
@Mill 1: If people are nominating pages you're creating for SD, why should I grant AP? What SD criteria are they using and why do you think they're wrong? Please provide some examples. voorts (talk/contributions) 12:21, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
Fair question. It exclusively envolves SD nominations regarding soft redirect pages. I created a lot of them lately (example). Some of the newer NPP-ers are unfamiliair with the soft redirect guidelines resulting in SD nominations. This topic on my Talk page pretty much sums it up. Mill 1 (talk) 12:37, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
Some examples + argumentation: 1, 2, 3. Again, these are not 'real' pages which should be the focus of this application.

79 articles created, zero deleted. Creations look excellent. ~ A412 talk! 04:46, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks @A412!
Really appreciate the "creations look excellent". Wish I could say that about my cupcakes when I decide to do some baking.
Saw this nomination in my alerts and was pleasantly surprised. If others feels this user right is a good thing to have, great! If not, fine, too! Whatever helps those editors who do the diligent, and thankless, work behind the scenes works for me.
OlympiaBuebird (talk) 15:27, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
 Done voorts (talk/contributions) 12:27, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi. I've created 26 pages on the English Wikipedia, mostly relating to New Zealand plants. I also frequently create redirects for the common names of plants. Alexeyevitch(talk) 05:10, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

I want to reapply for Autopatroller, to contribute further for creating new good quality articles, as long as I have reflected latest things happend before and i got an big lesson to not comment/accept new pages more via ip user without letting know. I appreciate any decission. Thank you for your attention. Lanceloth345 (talk) 11:37, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([13]). MusikBot talk 11:40, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
Requests for AutoWikiBrowser access

AutoWikiBrowser

I would like to create lists of articles I might want to edit based on Regex and categories. Because of my current computing setup I will need to use JWB, which, unlike AWB, requires being on the check page for all actions, including generating lists. I do not intend to actually make any semi-automated edits until I'm more confident in my Regex skills, and am willing to make another request when that time comes. JarJarInks٩(◕_◕)۶Tones essay 15:25, 5 May 2026 (UTC)

@JarJarInks: you're still under the normal requirements (at least 500 edits or 250 mainspace edits). With your use case, I can justify making an exception, but was wondering how you're getting on with Ponor's userscript instead? In solidarity, —Femke (talk) 🐦 16:54, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

I need to change a couple of thousand redirects real quick due to the French changing the names of their football leagues. Also I'm a page mover and this is just generally useful to have in the toolbox. ⹃Maltazarian parleyinvestigate 00:55, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Also I'd like it given to M-alt-azarian which is a technical alt account I've made for this purpose. ⹃Maltazarian parleyinvestigate 02:02, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
 Done * Pppery * in solidarity 06:28, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
Automated comment This user does not appear to have been added to the CheckPage. MusikBot talk 06:30, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
Hi. I very often help in WP:AI noticeboard with the takedown of LLM-generated articles. I often have to tag many articles with {{AI-generated}} during reports which can take time. Same thing goes during the WP:LLMPROD process, where I have to add {{prod llm}} to articles. My editing history on Wikipedia is also Poland-related articles on rail transport, such as railway stations. These articles often need maintaining such as updating the Train services section when the train timetable changes in Poland, in which it will on 13 June. Fortek67 (talk) 20:09, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the confirmed flag.

Confirmed

Requests for extended confirmation

Extended confirmed

Hello, according to the result from my AE, XC would be removed "until Edittttor has made enough manual non-repetitive edits to earn the right." I have now surpassed that threshold and am requesting reinstatement. I wish to edit articles about US politicians and sometimes those pages are ECP. For transparency, there is an open AE against me, but I believe that innocent until proven guilty should apply, and I have in good faith met the requirements for reinstatement. Based on the AE archives I've looked at, it could take weeks for a resolution there and it seems punitive to extend my punishment if I have met all the requirements. Will be an opportunity for the community to see how I handle reinstatement until the request is resolved. I will make a note there that I have requested reinstatement here. Thanks! Edittttor (talk) 17:14, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had 1 request for extended confirmed declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days ([14]) and has had this permission revoked in the past 180 days ([15]). MusikBot talk 17:20, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

Requesting for M-alt-azarian, a technical alt account. FYI it says I'm requesting for AWB there but that was already granted. ⹃Maltazarian parleyinvestigate 21:23, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Already done (automated response): This user already has the "extendedconfirmed" user right. MusikBot talk 21:30, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
 Done voorts (talk/contributions) 01:09, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the file mover flag.

File mover

Requests for new page reviewer

New page reviewer

I'm currently temporarily approved for NPR rights and I've been participating in the May 2026 backlog drive. I'm finding the review process good so far and I take pride in reducing the backlog. I'm hoping I can get an extension in my NPR rights so I can continue working on reviewing new pages. Thanks, DoO2 02:48, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by HJ Mitchell (expires 00:00, 31 May 2026 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 02:50, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Dog Oxide, could you comment on your review of mHUB? What was your thought process and procedure? signed, Rosguill talk 03:10, 3 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi, I'm requesting for permission to NPR. I meet the guidelines stated and I intend reducing the backlog by minimizing spam, unsourced and promotional content across new pages. Retro music11 (talk) 16:54, 1 June 2026 (UTC)

Also, @Left guide has allowed me to do so. (That's starting a new request with a relevant rationale) Thanks! Retro music11 (talk) 16:56, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days ([16]). MusikBot talk 17:00, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
 Done for 1 month as a trial run after which you may reapply. signed, Rosguill talk 23:00, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
Automated comment This user does not appear to have the permission new page reviewer. MusikBot talk 23:00, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
 Not done for the bot post-block signed, Rosguill talk 14:40, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Requesting indefinite permissions after two rounds of volunteering for the drives. If that is denied, requesting three months. 🌊PacificDepths (talk | contrib) 02:08, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

track record looks good,  Done signed, Rosguill talk 14:42, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

As a regular editor, I am well acquainted with the guidelines for WP:NPR and I would like to apply for reviewer rights for more useful contribution. Pinakpani (talk) 10:45, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

 Done for 1 month as a trial run, after which you are encouraged to reapply. signed, Rosguill talk 14:44, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Hello again, I would like to request an extension of my New Page Reviewer right until August or permanently if they deem it appropriate. I have held this right since May, and my trial period is set to expire on June 8. I believe I have been able to do a good job during this time.

Thank you very much in advance for your time and consideration. Sir Banking (talk) 17:28, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Rosguill (expires 00:00, 8 June 2026 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 17:30, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
track record looks good,  Done signed, Rosguill talk 14:55, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

I have been an active Wikipedia contributor for a while, and thought maybe I could be of help, that's if I meet the requirement to be a new page reviewer. Thank you. Obinna Tony (talk) 21:19, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions and your interest in this permission. On reviewing your recent editing history, it looks like an article you created was deleted at AFD about 2 weeks ago (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abuchi Peter Ugwu), so I don't think you're quite ready for this permission yet.  Not done, consider reapplying after getting more experience with article creation and deletion. signed, Rosguill talk 14:58, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Reason for requesting new page reviewer rights Devansh Pilania (talk) 08:16, 7 June 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has 5 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 08:20, 7 June 2026 (UTC)
(non-admin closure)  Not done, empty request and not meeting the guidelines. User97104 (tcrl) 00:07, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi, I'm re-applying for the NPP rights, as it was revoked due to inactivity. I've become active, and spending atleast 6h a day editing. I am now fully confident that I can tackle tasks related to NPP and AfC. Over the last few weeks, I've created 25 articles, edited at least 100 articles, and made over 500 edits in the span of 3–6 months since the start of 2026. I have also participated in AfD and, for the first time, closed an AfD discussion with the help of an admin on the Wikipedia Discord group. I'd like to regain this access, as I will be contributing regularly. Thank you. Tatupiplu’✦ talk 06:03, 8 June 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had 1 request for new page reviewer declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days ([17]). MusikBot talk 06:10, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for the page mover flag.

Page mover

Requests for pending changes reviewer

Pending changes reviewer

Reason for requesting pending changes reviewer rights Hello. I'd like to request the ability to accept or decline pending changes on both of my accounts (User:Wikipedian12512 and User:Wikipedian12512(alt). I've read the relevant policies (BLP, Vandalism, Copyright Violations, etc.), and think that I could do a reasonable (to start, I'd probably get better over time) job. Thank you! Wikipedian12512 (Talking is fine | contribs) 13:07, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

To be clear, this would be for both my accounts. In solidarityWikipedian12512 (Talking is fine | contribs) 17:04, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

I often do anti-vandalism and during the course of that task I often come across pending changes, I belive myself capable with aiding in this task, and wish to help out. Pyrrhic victor (what did I do) 16:22, 4 June 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'd like to request the pending changes reviewer right. I'd like to use this to make sure no vandalism occurs and to help around. Thank you! Ari 1600 out 🇺🇲🇭🇳 01:56, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Hello folks! I am requesting the pending changes reviewer rights. I wish to deal with the concerned pages — accepting or refusing pending changes, particularly, to handle the unsourced edits and COI vandalism. Thank you! BhikhariInformer 📮 (Ping me or else I won't see it) 05:38, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

I'm requesting this right to fight vandalism in PCR-protected articles. I have read the policies and have a basic understanding. This means I can deal with not-that-simple vandalism such as citation to ads and inserting AI-slop, which might be more common in PCR-protected articles. -- Least Action (talk) 14:08, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has 99 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 14:10, 5 June 2026 (UTC)
Requests for rollback

Rollback

Here to renew my temp perms, I use it on off when I can and idk if I qualify for perm RB yet. JoBo Gamer 11:29, 11 May 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user was granted temporary rollback rights by Pppery (expires 15:24, 13 May 2026 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 11:30, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
@Pppery: Up to you. Katietalk 22:22, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
I would describe my action as procedural, and it really should be up to HJ Mitchell who granted the first trial. * Pppery * it has begun... 18:25, 18 May 2026 (UTC)
@HJ Mitchell your presence is requested here.
JoBo Gamer 09:58, 2 June 2026 (UTC)

OK, I've reviewed what I was told at my last request. I now have over 200 mainspace edits. I've tried singing up to CVU/A, and now I'm just waiting. Requesting rollback permissions to try AntiVandal, Interceptor, and Huggle. And everything else. Patrolling RecentChanges seems to be the only thing I do nowadays, and I would like rollback to be able to fight vandals better. AZenit3 [Chat?-stuff I've done] 01:47, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Automated comment This user has had 1 request for rollback declined or withdrawn in the past 90 days ([18]). MusikBot talk 01:50, 25 May 2026 (UTC)

Been patrolling recent changes for some time now with Twinkle, and I would like to try using more advanced tools like Huggle which require this permission. TheNerdzilla (talk) 13:45, 29 May 2026 (UTC)

I've been using Twinkle for reporting potential SPs, creating deletion discussions and for notifying new users of unsourced edits. I'm requesting permission to the rollback tool as it'd assist me in reverting vandalism and malicious edits. Retro music11 (talk) 20:47, 30 May 2026 (UTC)

 Done TonyBallioni (talk) 03:32, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
Thank you kindly! Retro music11 (talk) 16:28, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
Automated comment This user does not appear to have the permission rollback. MusikBot talk 16:30, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi. I do recent changes patrolling every now and then. Twinkle is wonderful, but I'd like to be able to use tools like Interceptor and Wikishield. Chess enjoyer (talk) 06:19, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

 Done ASUKITE 16:05, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

Hello. I have rollback in my account at Simple Wikipedia. Having tried this evening to counter the activities of ~2026-33439-05 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), I think it would be useful to have rollback here too. I work almost exclusively on cricket articles at present, and it is a subject that frequently attracts vandals. Thanks. Jack (talk) 19:28, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

I have been a Pending changes reviewer and would like to have Rollback right to enhance my ability to counter vandalism as well as to use new tools it provides like Interceptor. AristocrSirr22 (talk) 07:31, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
There are no outstanding requests for template editor.

Template editor

Requests for temporary account IP viewer

Temporary account IP viewer

Would like to be able to check for signs of loutsocking on articles. I have suspicions that someone has done some very slow loutsocking on the article for Nathan Vasquez for example. Insanityclown1 (talk) 03:34, 12 May 2026 (UTC)

@Insanityclown1: I'm not sure how this perm would help identify LOUTSOCKing? It can compare temporary accounts to one another, which can detect when one person is operating multiple temporary accounts, but it can't connect temporary accounts to registered editors, which is what would show LOUTSOCKing. Can you please clarify? Best, HouseBlaster (talk • he/they) 04:07, 18 May 2026 (UTC)
Perhaps not the correct use of the term loutsocking, but what I was referring to is it appears that the same person is using multiple temporary accounts to insert the same diatribe. Insanityclown1 (talk) 04:41, 18 May 2026 (UTC)
Regarding Nathan Vasquez (lawyer), this permission would not help in cases where edits are this stale/far apart. IP address information is deleted when a temporary account expires 90 days after the edit is made. -- Reconrabbit (talk) 16:35, 20 May 2026 (UTC)

I am requesting to be a Temporary account IP viewer to deal with vandalism. Recently temporary accounts have been making disruptive edits on the pages Grachi and Esmeralda Pimentel. Knowing if multiple temporary accounts are from the same IP address with be useful when reporting vandalism. I agree to the policy and will only use the addresses for the prevention of vandalism. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 05:56, 5 June 2026 (UTC)

I often do a lot of anti-vandalism work and dealing with LTAs, also reporting some to m:SRG. This right would be very useful when dealing with disruption from multiple TAs on the same range. --Prothe1st (leave me a message)-- 00:41, 6 June 2026 (UTC)

 Done In solidarity, —Femke (talk) 🐦 06:34, 6 June 2026 (UTC)
    Category tracker


    Immediate requests

    Category Entries
    Wikipedians looking for help 0
    Requests for unblock 61
    Candidates for speedy deletion as attack pages 0
    Candidates for speedy deletion as copyright violations 0
    Candidates for speedy deletion 52
    Wikipedia fully protected edit requests 7

    Deletion

    Category Entries
    Articles for deletion 704
    Templates for deletion 1,190
    Categories for deletion 733
    Wikipedia files for discussion 149
    All redirects for discussion 501
    Miscellaneous pages for deletion 97
    Possible copyright violations 16
    All articles proposed for deletion 496
    All files proposed for deletion 11
    Unsorted AfD debates 0
    All files with the same name on Commons 58
    Category Entries
    Orphaned non-free use 545
    Unknown copyright status 34
    Unknown source 22
    No non-free use rationale 1
    Replaceable non-free use images 12
    Disputed non-free use images 5

    Page protection

    Category Entries
    Protected 10
    Semi-protected user and user talk pages 1,306
    Fully protected user and user talk pages 701
    Protected against vandalism 4
    Protected talk pages of blocked users 34
    Semi-protected 2,244
    Arbitration 500/30 restricted 0

    Cleanup

    General cleanup

    Category Entries Percentage
    All pages needing cleanup 34,146 0.47
    All articles needing rewrite 6,585 0.09
    All articles needing expert attention 1,320 0.02
    All Wikipedia articles in need of updating 44,637 0.62

    Reference problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    All pages needing factual verification 13,313 0.19
    All articles with unsourced statements 578,901 8.05
    All articles lacking sources 44,486 0.62
    All unreferenced BLPs 64 0.01
    All articles needing additional references 529,492 7.36
    All articles needing references cleanup 5,070 0.07
    All articles lacking in-text citations 108,965 1.51
    All articles with dead external links 355,197 4.94

    Image cleanup problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    Image files for cleanup 17 -
    Wikipedia files lacking a description 151 -
    Wikipedia files with unknown source 13 -

    Other problems

    Category Entries Percentage
    All articles proposed for merging 217 0
    All articles proposed for splitting 898 0.01
    Unsorted Stubs 0 -
    Stub categories 21,602 -
    All uncategorized pages 333 0
    All orphaned articles 53,131 0.74
    All articles needing copy edit 1,721 0.02
    All articles with style issues 20,258 0.28
    All Wikipedia articles needing context 2,650 0.04
    All articles that may contain original research 17,168 0.24


    Miscellaneous

    Category Entries
    Requested moves 407
    All Wikipedia neutral point of view disputes 2,119
    All accuracy disputes 15,635
    Articles with invalid ISBNs 1
    Articles with invalid ISSNs 22
    All articles to be expanded 52,183

    Special pages

    Maintenance reports Information
    Broken redirects
    Dead-end pages Dead-end pages
    Dormant pages Dusty articles
    DoubleRedirects Double redirects
    Lonely pages Orphaned articles
    Long pages
    New pages New page patrol
    New pages feed Page curation
    Protected pages Protection policy
    Short pages
    Uncategorized Categorization
    Uncategorized cats
    Uncategorized templates
    Unused categories
    Unused files (images)
    Unused templates
    Without interwiki links
    Most interwiki links


    Sub-page listing

    Hong Kong

    Hong Kong skyline at night

    Misc

    Delete Keep Neutral Oppose Support Note Template



    Multi-licensed with the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License versions 1.0 and 2.0
    I agree to multi-license my text contributions, unless otherwise stated, under Wikipedia's copyright terms and the Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike license version 1.0 and version 2.0. Please be aware that other contributors might not do the same, so if you want to use my contributions under the Creative Commons terms, please check the CC dual-license and Multi-licensing guides.

    Content Disclaimer

    Informasi ini disarikan dari Wikipedia dan disajikan kembali untuk tujuan edukasi. Konten tersedia di bawah lisensi CC BY-SA 3.0. Kami tidak bertanggung jawab atas ketidakakuratan data yang bersumber dari kontribusi publik tersebut.

    1. The information displayed on this website is sourced in part or in whole from Wikipedia and has been adapted for the purpose of restating it. We strive to provide accurate and relevant information, however:
    2. There is no guarantee of absolute accuracy. Wikipedia is an open, collaborative project that can be edited by anyone, so information is subject to change.
    3. It is not intended to constitute professional advice. The content displayed is for informational and educational purposes only. For important decisions (e.g., medical, legal, or financial), please consult a professional.
    4. Content copyright. Wikipedia is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC BY-SA). This means that content may be reused with appropriate attribution and shared under a similar license.
    5. Responsible use. Any risk arising from the use of information from this website is entirely the responsibility of the user.