User talk:Aisteco

Welcome to Wikipedia, Aisteco! Thank you for your contributions. I am SudoGhost and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! SudoGhost 20:59, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Pure Moods may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 23:22, 5 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Pure Moods, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Deer Hunter and State of the Heart (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the notice.

Yea, I know I'm talking to myself. :p

Aisteco (talk) 14:21, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit for Outrage Beyond linking the Godfather Trilogy looked helpful and constructive. Someone is oddly trying to delete it, possibly vandalism, and you may check to keep it maintained and in place. Good link.146.203.126.246 (talk) 16:18, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Aisteco, I reverted your edit of a reference in the Freedom From Religion Foundation article. The link was to the docket for the case not to the decision or opinion. In general when there is a link in a citation of a court case the link should point to the decision. Thanks for your contributions to WP.MrBill3 (talk) 08:08, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of parishes of the Latin Patriarchate of Jerusalem may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:41, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Regarding your edits to Inland Empire, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. – S. Rich (talk) 01:48, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Political divisions of Korea may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• *Special cities of North Korea]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:43, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Chad Michael Murray may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | ''[[[[Scruples (2012 film)|Scruples]]''

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:37, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

		The Disambiguator's Barnstar
		The Disambiguator's Barnstar is awarded to Wikipedians who are prolific disambiguators. Thanks for all the fixes this month; keep it up! PhnomPencil (talk) 09:57, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Beth Israel may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Places listings in Ada County, Idaho|listed on the National Register of Historic Places]] -->

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:22, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rage may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * [[Rage (TV program)|''Rage'' (TV program)]], ''rage'') is a popular all-night Australian music video program broadcast on ABC1 on Friday nights, Saturday

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:19, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Luis G. Jimenez-Arias may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Rome (2007). He received a M.Sc. in Microbiology from the [[University of Costa Rica]] (1986)] and a [[Master of Divinity]] from [[Saint Joseph's Seminary (Dunwoodie)|St. Joseph's Seminary and

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:22, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Albert Russo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Confrontation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Silly bot! I was the one that put the {{dn}}, someone else made the link.

Aisteco (talk) 14:23, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed that you made a series of edits like this one to Andrew Wakefield and other articles. For your future convenience, you should know that such changes aren't necessary or required, and don't appreciably alter the meaning or rendering of the article. Both ** and :* have the same effect – an indented or 'second-level' bullet within a list of items – and there's no need to change one to the other (unless you encounter a sufficiently-complicated list that uses multiple, confusing, inconsistent variations). Cheers! TenOfAllTrades(talk) 15:18, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I suspect that the tools that see it as an 'error' are simply reflecting their individual authors' personal philosophical preferences regarding syntax, rather than any specific policy. I can see a rationale for doing it either way; in practice, neither way is 'broken' and neither one needs to be 'fixed' by a change into the other. It does not harm, but it also makes no real improvement. TenOfAllTrades(talk) 23:31, 23 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to MacDunleavy/MacNulty physicians of Tirconnell may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• medical specialties in his lifetime,<ref>[http://munksroll.rcplondon.ac.uk/Biography/Details/2893]], Sir Weldon Dalrymple-Champneys, Royal College of Physicians, Lives of Fellows, Munk’s Roll, Vol.
• Champneys, Royal College of Physicians, Lives of Fellows, Munk’s Roll, Vol. VI (1966-1975), p. 321]</ref> an acquaintance of Sir [[Winston Churchill]]<ref>''Winston Spencer Churchill, Servant of

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 01:34, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of United States Air Force Academy alumni may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |ref=<ref name="hoover">((cite web|url=http://www.amazon.com/Hannah-Chronicles-Adventures-Hadley-Floor/dp/0615419682/ref=sr_1_

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:36, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Emma Dean may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• * ''Face Painter'' (November 2006, Doily Records/[[MRA Distribution]] - see ref. 8 ])

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:39, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Mr. Midnight may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• and released around every two to four months<!--Around that, but not so sure. Need verification (Edit by Sinexcite: Yes i've verified it. Most of the books range from 2 to 4 months with the
• | 魔屋 (古老怪屋）|| 镜中历险记 （鏡中歷險記）

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:05, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you have recently been editing articles found in Checkwiki. The location has now changed to WMFLabs and now is located at https://tools.wmflabs.org/checkwiki/cgi-bin/checkwiki.cgi?project=enwiki&view=project You can find more information at Wikipedia:WikiProject Check Wikipedia. Bgwhite (talk) 21:41, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Jason Horowitz. Since you had some involvement with the Jason Horowitz redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 06:11, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Corno Gabriele (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Free Thinker

URA3 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Negative selection

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:12, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

	The No Spam Barnstar
	Saw you removed advertising from Lincoln Park, Chicago. Thank you! Victor Grigas (talk) 20:33, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for correcting the misspelling ("Nuremburg") in the Chief Wahoo article. However, it was in a quote, and quoted mispelling should not be corrected. Actually, looking at the cited source [1], the writer actually had mangled it even worse ("Nuernberg"!), so I've put in the correct misspelling, and noted it with {{sic}}. TJRC (talk) 23:55, 30 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I sit corrected. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 00:13, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the "Wikipedia Typo Team" changing "moreso" to "more so".

They mean different things. Do you think I would get the article Old Rouen Tramway to GA withoud it being typo checked?

It is hard enough doing a translation without someone correcting it wrongly for something like that, two years later. I hate these kind of teams that think they can improve Wikipedia by undoing others' editors' hard work. How long do you think that took me to translate, add all the links, get the images sorted, translate the tables and the dual conversions, do the back articles, and you still can't be bothered to read it but just thow in an invalid typo correction?

This is why I don't edit Wikipedia much any more. Like a lot of things, it used to be good, and now is full of people who think they know what they are doing, rather than actually know what they are doing,

I am pissed off but I do genuinely wish you well and please continue to edit. But try reading what was written before you hit some automatic spelling checker that doesn't know its beans from its potoatoes.

S.

In case you're wondering, both "potatos" and "potatoes" are acceptable spellings according to Webster (American English) and OED (British English). I haven't looked that up online, I just have the books.

BTW I should say I don't own any article on wikipedia, nobody does, and I don't presume to. But a brief look down the history, which presumably the Typo Bot doesn't do, would show I did all the writing and (I imagine few) others) did the reading. So on that particular case, you are correcting my typo since I translted and wrote it. I corrected your false correction. That is fair. But I should be pleased if you looked before you leaped. Si Trew (talk) 03:11, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Too much hatred, incorrect information and rants about unrelated things. I won't answer.

Aisteco (talk) 19:35, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for corrections at Green Forest and Solford. I am actually quite good at spelling but my "s" key is very unreliable. Tigerboy1966  22:38, 13 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Salut!

Je ne parle pas très bien le français. Je suis desolé mais j'ai de parler en Anglais. I can't change an image you put in the article Acide truxillique. You put the beta-truxillic acid and it doesn't exist. Exist the beta-truxinic acid, but that is a different acid. That image in Stéréoisomérie is very interesting and I put it in the article in english and spanish, but that mistake I can't change it in wikimedia commons (the web where the image is). I seems that the extension svg doesn't recognise it in Spain... I would like you change it, but if you can't, I'll make another similar.

Merci beaucoup.

--Angarmonte (discuter) 8 décembre 2013 à 14:14 (CET)

Hello, Ho I see I make a mistake in the name: it isn't beta but gamma-truxillic acid like in the table on the english article - thank a lot for your attention- I correct the picture on wiki Commons and now it's good on the french article. Bye --Titou (talk) 13:52, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Good.

Aisteco (talk) 20:48, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings fellow disambiguator! Remember back in February when we made history by clearing the board for the first time ever, for the monthly disambiguation contest? Let's do it again in May! I personally will be aiming to lead the board next month, but for anyone who thinks they can put in a better effort, I will give a $10 Amazon gift card to any editor who scores more disambiguation points in May. Also, I will be setting up a one-day contest later in the month, and will try to set up more prizes and other ways to make this a fun and productive month. Cheers! bd2412 T 18:46, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Aric Cushing, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sincerely Yours. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 24 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I thought the usual practice was to keep titles of works like that as they were, but on re-reading this part of the Manual of Style, I could see how it could apply to this situation as well. The {{sic}} template doesn't work in the title field of a citation, so I've just re-corrected the typos. Graham87 02:40, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that you have been changing a number of pages to change the spelling of 'surprizing' to 'surprising'. Unfortunately in at least three edits you have changed the spelling within a quotation. I venture to suggest that a quotation should not be modified. In the example I have reverted (Yordas Cave) the quotation dates back to the 1750s when spelling wasn't as standardised as it is now. I haven't the time to check your other edits. Langcliffe (talk) 06:15, 6 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carlsberg Laboratory, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Substances. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, please do not "correct" items that are direct quotes, such as article titles. If there is a misspelling it is properly labeled with {{sic}}. Elizium23 (talk) 21:46, 16 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aisteco. You have new messages at Nbarth's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I have enabled your AWB access. --Biblioworm 22:00, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In regards to the WC content you reverted awhile back -- which I wholly support -- I don't think it's so much an advertisement for the site than the fact the site pumps out so many damn Mortal Kombat-related top-ten lists, most of which are generic, repetitive and badly written (like the reverted edits in the article itself). I really have to pick and choose in terms of adding reception to the article. Case in point, on Halloween they published "The Ten Characters NRS Wants You to Forget" (which I have no intention of adding). They already did a "worst MK characters" just this past April, for crying out loud. sixtynine ^{• speak up •} 03:23, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:52, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Coimbatore-Salem MEMU is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Coimbatore-Salem MEMU until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 05:28, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop with the unnecessary piping is not needed.

Per WP:NOPIPE "Given the option to pipe a link or to "blend" an affix, preferred style is to use a blended affix. Write simply "[[Public transport]]ation" instead of complicated "[[Public transport|Public transportation]]". Both display identically as Public transportation."

Please stop.

Gavbadger (talk) 14:23, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Llammakey:

@Gavbadger:

@Keith-264:

I was very clear when I reverted your edits but I see that you need further explanation and since other(s) have also reverted several of my edits I'll take the chance to explain to all:

• The plural of torpedo is torpedoes, see merriam-webster or search this wikipedia for both terms. I know this is strange to some, it's also to me but that's how it is.
• The word is also listed in the list Wikipedia:Lists of common misspellings/T so it's very likely that others will repeat what I just did, the same way I did.
• My edits were done to correct the spelling and in a way to prevent or minimize the occurrence of the misspell.
• There is nothing wrong with the use of piped links.
• Your reverts were done to either:
  • Re-introduce the misspelling, for example:here, here, here, here and many others...
  • Simply edit the article, for example: here
  • Fumble around in a way that proves the piping is necessary, for example: here. This is probably the result of using the revert instead of edit.

from Wikipedia:Revert only when necessary

Reverting is reversing a prior edit, in whole or in part. Revert vandalism upon sight but revert an edit made in good faith only after careful consideration. It is usually preferable to make an edit that retains at least some elements of a prior edit than to revert the prior edit. Furthermore, your bias should be toward keeping the entire edit.

The way you have been using the revert only causes confusion both to understanding what the problem is and to figure out who did what in the article. In the future, if you want to edit an article then use the edit button. I'll be reverting all your reverts to correct the misspellings once again.

Aisteco (talk) 15:11, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What are you on about? Keith-264 (talk) 15:16, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your work. Please remember not to link years (and dates and common terms). Tony (talk) 04:01, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Are you sure it was me? I usually remove such links. Aisteco (talk) 03:38, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aisteco. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aisteco. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! Based on your edits to NationStates, I thought maybe you would be interested that I started a series of userboxes for the game. Feel free to add any or add your own!-🐦Do☭torWho42 (⭐) 06:24, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm adding these as part of a project to add CC-BY licensed content from the New South Wales Heritage Register. The actual article text was generated in Wikipedia form by User:Kerry Raymond and then emailed to us. I'm not sure of her purpose in adding that, but she would be the person to ask - though she's currently travelling so may take a few days to get back to you. The Drover's Wife (talk) 00:51, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks!— Preceding unsigned comment added by ASiplas (talk • contribs) 00:06, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I see that after three years you are still not leaving edit summaries. Even if you are simply removing superfluous spaces, please leave an edit summary after every edit.—Anita5192 (talk) 22:24, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please help edit following page? To meet wiki guidlines

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Chandreshekar_Sonwane Rocketscience144 (talk) 04:32, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aisteco. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Aisteco. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and a Prosperous 2019!

Hello Aisteco, may you be surrounded by peace, success and happiness on this seasonal occasion. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Sending you a heartfelt and warm greetings for Christmas and New Year 2019. Happy editing, Meatsgains(talk) 16:06, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply] Spread the love by adding {{subst:Seasonal Greetings}} to other user talk pages.

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect We go to to the Gallery. Since you had some involvement with the We go to to the Gallery redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards, SONIC678 16:35, 3 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:Covert action combat.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:NOTBROKEN, Please do not "fix" links to redirects that are not broken. --Guy Macon (talk) 21:40, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether multiple related articles are suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The articles will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Road signs in Armenia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Happy Editing--IAmChaos 06:14, 23 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Aisteco! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II ^talk 17:14, 27 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]